Debating my top ten LMW list

I mentioned Norris and Jackson myself.

Nope, all 4 held championships at the weight class.

What's your list?

Why would I have Curry, Jones or Graham at the top of my list?

 

It's been a very long time since I've been called young so I'll happily take the compliment

 

No that's not what it means.

H2H means who the best boxers were in that weight class, but you can only ascertain that with who they fought and how the fought against them.

 

Are you the same guy who tried telling me Watson should be number 1 at SMW?

 

I'm considering moving Tito higher tbh, I think the extra weight benefitted him greatly although I find it hard picking between him and Oscar.

Yeah Terry Norris, I need to think his placement definitely.

I think Carter caught lightning in a bottle against Griffith and Hearns would not have fought that way against him. Hearns to take a decision imo.

 

How is Herol Graham number 3 by my criteria?

As for the second list, how is Duran higher than Benitez?

 

I've explained exactly what my criteria is.

Please see the opening post.

 

Updated list

Rank First Last
1 Thomas Hearns
2 Emile Griffith
3 Mike McCallum
4 Winky Wright
5 Floyd Mayweather
6 Oscar De La Hoya
7 Shane Mosley
8 Tito Trinidad
9 Julian Jackson
10 Terry Norris

 

Why do you massively over rate these british fighters of the 80s and 90s

I mean 83, what was his best victory at point, at what level where these H2H skills proven?

He was a borderline top ten LMW in 1983,scraping in a ring ranking at the lower end.

How can you possibly rate him as better than everyone else.

Especially when Julian Jackson knocked him out!