Joe Louis (Charles fight) vs Michael Spinks (Holmes I fight)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by It's Ovah, Jun 13, 2020.

  1. It's Ovah

    It's Ovah I am very feel me good. Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2016
    Messages:
    14,882
    Likes Received:
    19,141
    How does an older, slowing Joe Louis from the Ezzard Charles fight perform against the tricky Spinks? Does he do enough to win, or does Spinks befuddle and outbox him?

    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  2. TipNom

    TipNom Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2019
    Messages:
    1,449
    Likes Received:
    2,993
  3. Jackomano

    Jackomano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2014
    Messages:
    8,264
    Likes Received:
    7,007
    Spinks would’ve been tough for Louis even in his prime, so he’d definitely be all wrong for an older Louis.
     
  4. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2019
    Messages:
    8,547
    Likes Received:
    9,574
    I think I agree, Louis lacked speed at this point and he could be outboxed. Far from given of course, but Spinks was good enough to win decision here. Similar fight to first Holmes one.
     
  5. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2019
    Messages:
    27,130
    Likes Received:
    44,895
    And Spinks had longer arms than Charles, he wouldn't have to fight on the inside here like Ezz did.
     
  6. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2019
    Messages:
    8,547
    Likes Received:
    9,574
    That's true it gives him another dimension. I have to say though that Louis was still extrwmely good in 1950 and you need to be prepared for very tough fight to beat him. Charles won the fight comfortably, but it's not like Louis was hopeless against him. I don't think anyone else (outside of Walcott maybe) could beat that version of Louis in that time.
     
  7. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2017
    Messages:
    36,654
    Likes Received:
    16,562
    Holmes was a sitting target in `85, Louis showed better head movement and Charles was far better than Spinks.
     
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2020
  8. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2017
    Messages:
    36,654
    Likes Received:
    16,562
    He couldn`t fight inside like Charles did.
     
  9. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2019
    Messages:
    27,130
    Likes Received:
    44,895
    I think Walcott would've done it, Louis wasn't exactly any better in 50 than he was a few years earlier. And 14 months off didn't help. Actually, I think Archie Moore could've done it. Archie would've stuck to him like glue, and known to circle to the left, as to nullify Louis' jab and hook, since that's basically all what was left of his offence at that time.

    Yeah, Spinks' dimensions here give him a nice little game-plan here, and I think he had the better jab than Louis anyway. If Spinks treats it how he did Qawi, and boxes on the back-foot, rather than try to search and destroy I think his superior foot-speed let's him win.
     
  10. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2019
    Messages:
    8,547
    Likes Received:
    9,574
    Yeah I forgot about Moore, he could have done that too. He was smart enough to see old Louis deteriorations and use it to his advantages.
     
  11. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2017
    Messages:
    36,654
    Likes Received:
    16,562
    Spinks would land a lot of 1-2`s like in the Holmes fight but Louis`s right hand was still sharp.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  12. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2019
    Messages:
    27,130
    Likes Received:
    44,895
    Moore was such a complete fighter, one of the all-time best. I'd have him top 10 for ability AND greatness.
     
  13. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2019
    Messages:
    27,130
    Likes Received:
    44,895
    No, no it wasn't. :lol: It's actually known for not being sharp by this point.
     
    Reinhardt likes this.
  14. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2019
    Messages:
    8,547
    Likes Received:
    9,574
    I'd say that it was still dangerous but definitely not sharp.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  15. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2019
    Messages:
    8,547
    Likes Received:
    9,574
    I have him top 10 for ability, greatness and entertainment ;)