Luis Ortiz v Tom Sharkey 20 rounds

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Jun 20, 2020.


Luis Ortiz v Tom Sharkey

  1. Sharkey by Dec

    4.8%
  2. Sharkey by KO

    19.0%
  3. Ortiz by Dec

    9.5%
  4. Ortiz by KO

    66.7%
  1. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,606
    2,496
    Nov 6, 2011
    I also thought we were talking about Jack Shirley, another boo boo on my part. I’ll pay closer attention in future lol
     
  2. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    How much wrestling is allowed?
     
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,758
    46,449
    Feb 11, 2005
    As much as you wish to allow. Do we always assume the guys from yesteryear are better wrestlers?
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  4. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,575
    May 30, 2019
    Not neccessarily, Fitzsimmons for example wasn't as good in clinches as some of the top fighters of this era.

    It's reasonable to expect from them to be better though, as this was much bigger part of their styles than modern boxers.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    Fitz kod him twice, Ortiz who is a good counterpuncher, would have no difficulty landing on the wide open Sharkey.
     
    Webbiano likes this.
  6. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    No, but I assume the one that held his own with the wrestling champion is the better wrestler.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    "I know nothing about wrestling ." Bob Fitzsimmons.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  8. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,575
    May 30, 2019
    Fitz is much better than Ortiz though.
     
  9. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,758
    46,449
    Feb 11, 2005
    Head to head, Ortiz would destroy Fitz. Please. There isn't the 160-170 fighter born who would stand up to him over 12 rounds unless that fighter was running circles in a 50 foot ring. Let's cut the bullsh*t.
     
    Bukkake, TipNom and mrkoolkevin like this.
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    Yes he is,he was much better than Jeffries imo but that didnt stop him getting beat.Too much size and weight to concede,you can get away with that against the Dunkhorst's of the fistic world, but not against class big men who can box and punch. Sharkey was crude , with a porous defence.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    When did this happen?
     
  12. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,133
    44,914
    Mar 3, 2019
    I'm fairly confident that James Toney could.
     
    70sFan865 likes this.
  13. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,575
    May 30, 2019
    Well, there is always possibility of stopping Ortiz earlier ;)
     
  14. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,575
    May 30, 2019
    Jeffries was also better than Ortiz.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  15. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014