Thomas Hearns vs Floyd Mayweather Jr

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by scandcb, Jun 23, 2020.


  1. Blaxx

    Blaxx Active Member Full Member

    521
    621
    Feb 8, 2018
    I know it's just opinion, but I don't see any of those guys having great jabs. Very good perhaps.
    And the problem for Hearns against Hagler, Benitez and Barkley wasn't his jab, it was his right hand. Not that Floyd would rush in the way the latter two did anyway.
     
  2. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,755
    17,815
    Apr 3, 2012
    Maywether had the same reach as Andries. Hearns would have a 6 inch reach advantage. The way to take that kind of reach advantage away is to feign and jab to body when the opponent steps forward. I think Mayweather might be able to get a rhythm with mostly jabs to Hearns' body and then work off the jab.
     
  3. Doppleganger

    Doppleganger Southside Slugger Full Member

    1,920
    371
    Dec 30, 2005
    It's a slightly unfair match-up, as Mayweather is right at the limit of where he can fight at the top level and Hearns is at a near prime weight. it would be much better putting FMJ vs Duran as a match-up. I don't see FMJ having much of a chance as Hearns is so much bigger and like olthers have said, no-one outboxed Tommy.
     
  4. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,834
    6,603
    Dec 10, 2014
    I think it would be similar to Hearns v. Benitez. Hearns by UD.
     
  5. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    Floyd would have been in survival mode.
     
  6. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    Context.

    Who did Floyd fight with Hearns’ style, size and ability?

    It doesn’t matter if Floyd was never knocked out.

    Tommy didn’t control Hagler’s jab, because Hagler wouldn’t box with him. He fought him. He went to war with him and tried to force a shootout.

    Floyd didn’t fight guys. He was a master boxer.

    Yes, Floyd took away those guys jabs. But apart from Oscar, Floyd had a reach advantage.

    He wouldn’t have been able to have taken Tommy’s jab away.

    Tommy was 6’1 with a 78” reach.

    Tommy would have had zero respect for Floyd’s power, whereas Floyd would have fought extremely defensively, where he’d have been very wary of Tommy’s awesome power.
     
  7. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    But Andries was a big, strong LHW.
     
  8. surfinghb1

    surfinghb1 Member Full Member

    477
    847
    Jul 28, 2019
    Oscar, being 8-10 years past prime was the blue print and what exposed May ... May couldn't handle the pressure jab, but Oscar gassed ... And Hearns is on a whole new level ... In may's defense , this is 10 pounds plus over his best weight ... The Mayweather fans , for some reason, love to add the weight and Match him with Hearns , Ray , and SRR ... It just isn't realistic .. And if they truly followed May's career , then they already know May doesn't take these fights .... It is one of the worst style match ups conceivable for May, over his best weight and going against that ATG Prime motor city cobra jab and power right cross
     
    Loudon likes this.
  9. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    If Floyd had been around in the early 80’s, he’d have taken more vacations than Clark Griswold.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2020
    Abysswalker and surfinghb1 like this.
  10. Devon

    Devon Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,472
    5,655
    Dec 31, 2018
    Mayweather always found a way to win, I believe mayweather would counterpunch on the front foot whilst staying just clear of the devastating Hearns right hand, Mayweather couldn't counterpunch on the back foot because his counters would be falling short with Hearns knowing how to use his reach, but Mayweather would be on the front foot forcing Hearns to throw and putting him under pressure and countering his every move, Mayweather on points
     
  11. surfinghb1

    surfinghb1 Member Full Member

    477
    847
    Jul 28, 2019
    c'mon man ... May would be up against the ropes fast trying his shoulder roll .. but it wouldn't matter because Hearns would have the distance measured fast and peppering him with the that jab... May aint going after Hearns its the other way around, there is no front foot for May
     
    Loudon likes this.
  12. Devon

    Devon Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,472
    5,655
    Dec 31, 2018
    Mayweather could adapt to any opponent and change his style to beat them and I've seen Mayweather fight on the front foot before
     
  13. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    When was the last time Mayweather face a fighter with longer reach?
     
  14. surfinghb1

    surfinghb1 Member Full Member

    477
    847
    Jul 28, 2019
    I mean how many Hearns fights have you seen? May is not going forward in this fight, May is not going to be center ring trying to land his lead right, he is going backwards in this fight and fast ... And I would bet Hearns has the faster hands at 147 not May
     
    Loudon likes this.
  15. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,174
    25,424
    Jan 3, 2007
    Head to head Thomas Hearns would beat Floyd Mayweather. Why ? Because he was naturally the much bigger and stronger man. Floyd was a jr. lightweight who gradually ascended in weight over the course of his career. By the time he hit welter he was already in his early thirties. Hearns began in the pros as an outstanding welter and had success in higher weight classes going all the way up to cruiser.... now “ legacy wise” I rank Floyd higher but that’s an entirely different argument.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2020
    Loudon and surfinghb1 like this.