Than Fury's two best wins? Hernandez and Corrales. He was the underdog against 2 reigning champions, and won relatively easily in both.
Not no but **** no. wilder was considered a bum by the same clowns who are saying his 2 top wins are better. ****ing hilarious some people will say or do anything to promote their agenda. So now the wilder win is better than PBF's win over pac canelo oscar jmm cotto jlc or chico? Lmfao! This thread shows you how much pbf is hated. Pbf clearly has the 2 best wins of the the 2. Next thing you'll here is fury is greater than pbf.
Prime Wladimir Klitschko was a great win. Only 40 years old, a perfect age for a HW. Who knows why all the other fighters keep retiring in mid 30s. Can you imagine what Fury would have done to the green 30-35 year old Wlad who just graduated from high school?
Log off. Pbf didn't duck **** you don't even know what you're talking about. Roach admitted it was their fault the fight didn't happen because they didn't want testing. Had pac tested the fight would have happened and pbf would have beat him then to and you'd be crying about that and have excuses.
Troll alert. Jmm Hatton oscar cotto canelo chico jlc and pac are better wins than an old wlad and a bum as you called wilder
If we're talking about sheer names then it's hard to beat Klitschko or Wilder. However, let's not pretend that Klitschko wasn't way past his prime or that Wilder was anything other than a glorified puncher. Floyd's CV is much better and his achievements much greater. He hit the ground running and running through guys like they were nothing in his pomp. However, feel free to disagree. That's what this forum is for.
He was the champ at 130, what are you talking about? Also, Corrales was the favourite going into that fight.
