Jack Sharkey vs Johnny_B

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by 70sFan865, Jul 20, 2020.


Who wins?

  1. Jack Sharkey

    14 vote(s)
    45.2%
  2. Johnny_B

    17 vote(s)
    54.8%
  1. Pat M

    Pat M Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,705
    4,254
    Jun 20, 2017
    Johnny B, your opinion is shared by many/most young fighters who have watched the old timers on video. I have never talked to a modern fighter who was impressed by video of a fighter from the 30s. Just a few days ago I was talking to one of our boxers and he was laughing about seeing some video of Marciano. He even did an impression of Marciano fighting, hands at chest level, throwing telegraphed punches, etc. He said that if he had been boxing in the 50s and before he'd be a legend today. I think that a lot of the people who post here would be surprised if they knew what modern boxers/trainers really thought of the old time video. Most are smart enough not to give their true opinion in public after finding out what happened to Larry Holmes when he told the truth.

    Bert Sugar, Tracy Callis, and other "historians" are not boxers, their idea of a "good" fighter and a boxer/trainer's idea are probably not even close to the same. Sharkey isn't the worst of the 30s boxers I've seen, he's better than most of them, but as he was at his best, he wouldn't be a contender today or even in the top 100.
     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2020
  2. Johnny_B

    Johnny_B Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,891
    1,312
    Feb 8, 2020
    I have sparred with many top amateurs, but it was just sparring.
    Also, Sharkey was a top boxer over 100 years ago, his skillset is poor by modern standards.
    To put things into perspective, take the best car from 100 years ago. Now compare it with your average car nowadays, say a Toyota Corrolla. The Toyota would **** all over the old car, although by modern standards, the Toyota ain't ****.
    Same applies to boxing.
     
  3. Johnny_B

    Johnny_B Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,891
    1,312
    Feb 8, 2020
    The fact that I'm skilled enough to use my considerable size advantage to win.

    I've sparred with many top amateurs, some dominated me and some were dominated by me. But those were mostly my size.
    I've taken their punches, granted most of the time with headgear, but since I could take theirs, how could a small guy ever hurt me ?!

    Yes, Mayweather will outpoint me, but he'd never hurt me. He just doesn't have the power. About 7 or 8 years ago, me and a friend sparred with Leonard Doroftei, a former lightweight world champion. Doroftei was around 43 at the time. My friend is around 5.10, so he's not much bigger than Doroftei. Doroftei took it easier on him, but he still outpointed him with ease.
    Then it was my turn. He didn't take it easy on me, cause he saw me as being bigger and he joked that I can take it. He ducked under my shots and landed many body shots, but I took them. I blocked some with my arms, and it might sound that I'm bragging, but those didn't hurt at all. He couldn't land any on my face, at least not clean, just a few glancing blows that did no damage whatsoever. That gave me courage so the next time he came in, I sorta abandoned my defense and cautious approach and manhandled him. I grabbed him and pushed him back with ease, then unleaded punches which made him retreat, and even though he blocked almost all of them, I could see him being hurt a bit, in the sense that I damaged his arms. I completely dominated him after that. By that I mean that he rarely managed to land on me, while I kept on pounding on his guard and head and I even floored him once. He congratulated me after that, but he also said he'd beat the crap out of me if he was my size. I enjoyed that, I think it was his way of praising me without losing face.
    I am aware that the man was retired and he's nowhere near Mayweather's level, but I'm very confident Mayweather won't be able to hurt me either.
     
  4. Johnny_B

    Johnny_B Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,891
    1,312
    Feb 8, 2020
    That was my point all along, that the sport has evolved bigtime.

    My thoughts exactly.
     
    Pat M likes this.
  5. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,575
    May 30, 2019
    Cars are machines, humans are living beings. This analogy is absolutely terrible.

    So do you really think that you had better skills than Sharkey? If so, show us clips of you being better than that:

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  6. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,575
    May 30, 2019
    So your friends from gym believe they would dominate Joe Louis?

    Seriously, this reminds me some fools who plays pickup basketball who believe they'd dominate Jerry West or Oscar Robertson one on one. They wouldn't score a basket against them.
     
  7. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,575
    May 30, 2019
    Top 100 at his weight? He wouldn't be top 100 CW? You can't be serious...
     
    cross_trainer and swagdelfadeel like this.
  8. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,575
    May 30, 2019
    Would you beat Joe Louis as well?
     
  9. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,123
    8,838
    Aug 15, 2018
    No offense but you’re kind of making me think you never did any of that. I’ve sparred with pros weighing 220. Amateurs at 180 and just very large men at 270. All of them hit differently but the hardest I’ve been hit is from a guy who was barely an amateur at 205. Hit like a damn mule. Even the coaches said so. Wilders “skills” are laughable even by 30s standards. If you’ve spent time in a real gym you’d probably know size isn’t everything. But much like many of the phonies in here who’ve said they used to spar you say things that just don’t add up. I get thinking 30s guys fight slightly different then today but make no mistake that guys ran through countless real fighters...something you’ve never done. He’s probably way more dangerous then he gets credit for. If anything the fighters today have size but it’s skill they lack. Wilder can’t fight going backwards. Ruiz can’t cut off a ring. Nobody properly uses feints (except Mayweather and Wlad and theyre gone). You see “skill” I see roided up premadonnas who fight once a year. Last I checked in the US there are barely any boxing gyms open. Boxing is a dying sport and with it goes the knowledge.
     
  10. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,123
    8,838
    Aug 15, 2018
    Lol this is the exact analogy I was thinking.
     
  11. Johnny_B

    Johnny_B Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,891
    1,312
    Feb 8, 2020
    I never claimed Wilder is very skilled, so I don't know what you are talking about.
    For me, the best era of HW's was the 90's. And it's only logical that if there aren't as many people taking up boxing and the HW division in particular, the sport is gonna decline.
     
    swagdelfadeel and Gazelle Punch like this.
  12. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,123
    8,838
    Aug 15, 2018
    Sorry should have more referenced Pat who likes to say “modern” fighters laugh at past fighters. Meanwhile they could all learn from the likes of Marciano, Moore, Louis, and so on. You’re favorite era is the 90s huh? Fun era for sure. But remember old guys like Foreman and Holmes who should have been long put to bed were able to compete. Don’t knock the guys from the past but learn from them.
     
  13. Johnny_B

    Johnny_B Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,891
    1,312
    Feb 8, 2020
    Pat was talking about boxing in general, not one specific division.
    And just like me, when he talks about modern boxers, he probably means from the 70's and 80's onwards, not just about the 2010's.
    The thing is Wilder is kinda similar to Foreman, neither was very skilled, but they both pack great punching power.
    Sometimes physical attributes can overcame lack of skill. Just look at how Ali dominated the 60's despite not having proper fundamentals.
     
  14. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,123
    8,838
    Aug 15, 2018
    Foreman was no unskilled oaf like Wilder. Far from it. Had some of the best trainers imaginable in Moore (who’s more skilled then any fighter today) and Saddler. If you watch the Frazier fight it was a thing of beauty. Wonderful game plan executed excellently. I do share your opinion with fighters pre 30s was almost a different sport then.
     
  15. Johnny_B

    Johnny_B Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,891
    1,312
    Feb 8, 2020
    Yeah, that was my point all along, that guys pre 30's wouldn't stand much chance against guys like Liston, Ali, Foreman, Holmes, Tyson, Lewis, Bowe, etc
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.