Why isn't RJJ's victory over James Toney more highly rated

Revisionist history

 

It’s just like Leonard and Duran ...the excuses have become facts

 

How well would he rehydrate with the weigh-in not hours before the fight. Jones was a lean 170+ against Bernard H

 

Now there careers are over I can't see it any other way tbh.

 

I think both are ATGs but Jones ranks higher. Toney was weight drained for this fight but Jones was so dominant that he would likely have beaten an inshape Toney.The Toney win is wideley regarded as his best win so I am not sure what this thread is all about.

 

Wash your mouth out. Guy who schools Pacquaio 3 times and then decapitates him is better than the guy who loses every round to Pacquaio. Especially when JMM beat MAB when they were the exact same age

Also where the hell is JMM-Pac 4 not on your list? And somehow Pac-Morales is when Morales is coming off a shut out loss

Also Pac never won any of those fights

 

Styles make fights.

I didn't include Pac v JMM 4 because I was only talking about ATG fighter's losing in their prime.

Errrmmm what are you going on about? Morales lost to Raheem After he'd battered Pac around the ring.

 

Toney didn`t know how to close the distance on Roy, it was liker the 'no mas' fight in some ways.

 

I think Jake was a better body puncher than anybody Roy fought but his punches might not have been hard enough to stop Roy.

 

Nunn stoop right in front of Toney, I think Toney had problems closing the distance on movers,Johnson gave him problems also.

 

Big how?

He was 5'8 with a 67" reach.

He was easy to hit and he marked up.

He'd never have found Roy's jaw.

 

Except zduran literally quit on his stool and Toney didn't.

 

McCallum, Hopins and Toney say hello.

 

I like Jake but RJ would have dazzled him with his speed. I see Jake having some sucess only in the later rounds but dropping a UD