Vitali Klitschko vs Evander Holyfield

And that is fine...you seem to be quite open minded which is a rare thing to find on this board.

 

I look forward to seeing your card.

 

Dummy , you were wrong about this before and you're going to be wrong about it again now.

What you presented was not the full data. Vitali threw 240 jabs , Lewis threw 120. This shows Vitali missed more opposed to Lewis who was more accurate.

Vitali's jabs were ineffective. Lewis jabs were harder and more precise. The connect percentage proves it.
Lewis - 43%
Vitali - 32%

Watch some footage.

Look how Lewis is moves his overweight body at almost the speed as Vitali throws a jab

This content is protected

oh dear. The footage doesn't lie.. Let it play out while your at it. Watch Vitali paw his jab with no snap or authority

Want me to stamp the moments Lewis blows Vitali back with real ramrod jabs?? The footage will destroy you. I actually feel sorry for you at this stage.

Its clear you are having another meltdown. . But its kinda funny watching you blither mentally deranged ramblings to yourself.

 

So there was just 2 points separating them at the time of the retirement? What you conveniently missed out was the fact that Lewis landed significantly more of his jabs than Vitali did! 43% to 32%
And he threw just half as many jabs .120 to 240!

This content is protected

Jabs Lewis Klitschko
Landed 52 77
Thrown 120 240
Percent 43% 32%
Power Punches Lewis Klitschko
Landed 50 79
Thrown 102 192
Percent 49% 41%
Total Punches Lewis Klitschko
Landed 102 156
Thrown 222 432
Percent 46% 36%
This shows Lewis was easily the more accurate puncher of the two by11%!
If anyone should be shamed here it is you but,since you have no shame we know that will not happen!lol

Vitali threw more punches but percentage wise Lewis landed more!

 

I don't need to look at boxrec to know that Bruno jabbed the head off Lewis.. Lewis did not build up attrition on Bruno like he did with Vitali , he eventually got to him and blasted him out.

You exposed yourself as a boxrec warrior who relies on numbers to form an argument. You don't know anything about boxing and everybody in this thread knows it.

I see you pulled a quit job re: Vitali Byrd remacth. Like you always do. 6 months later you will regurgitate all the same lies again.

 

He is still regurgitating lies from a decade ago ,it doesn't matter how many times he is corrected and proven to be lying,he is shameless!

 

When I look at these highlights, it's difficult to see how Vitali improved after his fight with Lewis - not in any notable way I can see. He maintained the same style, throughout his career and, in the main, it looked very effective against the lower-tier opposition he was facing.

 

LOL, you said

dinovelvet Lewis clearly won the battle of the jabs. At one point a Lewis jab buckled the knees of Vitali.

" Dinovelvet - Lewis clearly won the battle of the jabs." That is a lie. Vitali threw more and landed more. That is wining the battle of the jabs by anyone's definition.

The judges agreed giving Vitlai 4 of the 6 rounds....all three of them.

Saying that one guy who clearly landed less, but had a better connect percentage means little. He was out landed, period! It's like saying in a football game, your team had more passing yards than ours, but our top Wide receiver had more yards than top receiver. Your trying to cover for a lie Dino. You would be best served grasping for a straw before opening your mouth,

Now can you admit Lewis avoided the re-match or not? Duck, Duck, Duck...Dino!

 

He did improve after this fight. The really big heavies tend to mature a bit later. The fact Machine_Man is this. Regardless of who he was fighting, Vitali was always in the lead after 3 rounds, even with a bad cut or injury. Who else in history can match this in any weight class?

You can't / won't answer that question! Try being truthful and say oh you do have point.

Vitali fought two lineal champions, 8-9 ring magazine top ten opponents who were ranked when he fought them and some alphabet champions. He only fought one man with a losing record, who lasted 1 round. Outside of that, he beat heavyweights with winning records.

 

Seriously dude, you the know liar here, banned at least three times that I am aware of and guilty of staring racial threads. You're also a bet welcher. Now be silent, hold your forked tongue inside your mouth.

Who do you think won the battle of the jabs?

Fighter A who threw more and landed more by a good margin.

Fighter B who threw less and landed less.

Do tell.

 

The best jabs of the fight were landed by Lewis and Im pretty sure those jabs caused some of the damage that lead to the stoppage.
Lewis bore in with a superior jab while Vitali's jab was unable to stop him.. Therefore , Lewis won a battle of the jabs.

Why don't you explain in boxing jargon how Vitali won a battle of the jabs? Explain it from a technical perspective?? This should be funny..lol!!

 

Keep talking, I'll archive all your lies with correcting facts, providing them in full context when I choose. Fun! If you watch the film Vitlai lands a tripple jab. He landed far more jabs than Lewis, hence he won the battle of the jabs easily. Only a brain damaged person or extreme hater would think otherwise. You are bit of both.

Now stop ducking the questions!

This content is protected

Well, we are waiting.....DUCK, DUCK, DUCK Dino.

 

First cut was opened by a right hand in the second round

 

You were asked to explain how Vitali won a battle of the jabs and your answer was - because he landed a triple jab..

Thats it. That is all you had to give

I told you your response would be funny.. You just do not know how to talk boxing from a technical perspective.

"He landed far more jabs than Lewis"

No , he only landed 25 more jabs than Lewis.. And he had to throw 120 more than Lewis just to land those 25.

Lewis only missed 68 times.. Vitali missed 163 times.

The best jabs were landed by Lewis whereas Vitali's jabs had no effect at all on Lewis. Lewis used the jab to get inside , Vitali tried and failed to jab Lewis on the outside.
Is this statement false? If it is explain why , moron.. lol

 

Never started or indeed " starred "in a racial thread.
Banned for overiding the censor asterisk.
Making public a disgusting pm sent to me by Jamal Perkins accusing me of being a paedo.
Banned for matching the best black champions against the best white ones.

Made a bet with you that the Ruhlin v Fitzsimmons fight was not filmed and it wasnt and Gilbert Odd,Klompton, and Adam Pollack stated the same.
Your excuse for not honouring the bet was that a re-enactment was filmed two weeks later and so that counts as the filmed fight.
Percentage wise Lewis easily won the jab battle and not only the jab battle he won every other one .
Jabs Lewis Klitschko
Landed 52 77
Thrown 120 240
Percent 43% 32%
Power Punches Lewis Klitschko
Landed 50 79
Thrown 102 192
Percent 49% 41%
Total Punches Lewis Klitschko
Landed 102 156
Thrown 222 432
Percent 46% 36%
All Vitali did was throw more punches,most of which did not land!