Jim Corbett vs Jack Sharkey

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by 70sFan865, Aug 6, 2020.


Who would have won?

  1. Jim Corbett

    17.4%
  2. Jack Sharkey

    82.6%
  1. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,574
    May 30, 2019
    Do you have any details about Goddard's style, strengths and weaknesses?
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,681
    28,997
    Jun 2, 2006
    And Jackson nearer the exit.I don't pretend to know much about Goddard,but by all accounts he could bang a bit.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,681
    28,997
    Jun 2, 2006
    Corbett's winning resume is very shallow.
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,681
    28,997
    Jun 2, 2006
    I think you might be right!
     
    Big Ukrainian likes this.
  5. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,344
    Jun 29, 2007
    Sullivan by his own admission said Jeffries was far more skilled than he. He hit hard and had a very good /great fight hand, but as far as we view as skills, not many.

    Being a mover is not just hand speed, but footspeed being primary, Louis had slow feet, Jackson by accounts did not,.
     
  6. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,344
    Jun 29, 2007
    He beat 5 hall of fame people on the resume you're looking at and never quite lost to lesser men as Jack Sharkey did.
     
  7. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,344
    Jun 29, 2007
    Sullivan was struggling by the mid 1880's, Jackson cleans his clock before Corbett did if given a chance.
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,129
    45,411
    Feb 11, 2005
    Corbett looks like warmed over dogsh*t on film. He looks like someone who watched Bugs Bunny and Yosemite Sam fight and emulated their moves without even practicing them first.

    I'm taking Sharkey by a schooling and a clowning.
     
    Bujia, Bukkake and Pat M like this.
  9. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,574
    May 30, 2019
    Most people viewed Sullivan as skilled puncher who used crouch and head movement. Sullivan becane very generous for younger generations when he retired.
    Louis did not have slow feet, no matter how many times you'll repeat that.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  10. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,574
    May 30, 2019
    That's because he rarely fought, Sharkey had much more fights against top 10 contenders than him. I'm sure that Jack would have won at least one fight against Sailor Tom in two fight series.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,681
    28,997
    Jun 2, 2006
    He beat an alcoholic washed up Sullivan,who had not fought for over 4 1/2years
    He beat a novice Choynski.
    He beat an undersized super middle Mitchell, Corbett 184lbs to Mitchell's 165lbs,Mitchell was having his second to last fight
    He beat Kid McCoy and many think McCoy tanked to set up a Corbett Jeffries fight.
    He beat Kilrain, apart from a fellow novice Godfrey who of stature had Kilrain beat when he fought Corbett.
    Beating Hall Of Famers is fine,but what is important is WHEN you beat them.
    Sharkey beat modern full sized heavyweights of class in their prime and Corbett never did.
     
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2020
  12. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,592
    1,852
    Dec 2, 2006
    Sullivan isn't the issue, Jackson didn't become a factor in international boxing until late 1888 when he beat Godfrey in 19 rounds. Farnan was whipping him in 1884 and Peter took 30 rounds to beat average middleweight Tom Lees to win the Aussie title. It's all about the time frame, forget mid '80's for Jackson. However, from 1888 on Jackson should defeat Sullivan IMO.
     
    mcvey and 70sFan865 like this.
  13. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,633
    Mar 17, 2010
    Let’s say a random 6’3 athlete with no prior boxing experience started training at the Mayweather gym. After 12 months of full time training, and 100 sparring sessions, do you think he would beat Corbett?
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,681
    28,997
    Jun 2, 2006
    Corbett won the title with13 fights under his belt[forget the nonsense propounded by a poster claiming exhibitions as real fights,]I think a moderately talented big guy with the same number of contests and some amateur background would have a real shot.
    I'll say right now that I think a guy like Francesco Damiani had more boxing ability than Corbett and would beat him.
     
    Bujia and mattdonnellon like this.
  15. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,344
    Jun 29, 2007
    And how many rounds did it take Sullivan to finish Kilrain or Mitchel? ( 75 and 39 rounds ) Mitchell was a middle not known for power managed to floor Sullivan.

    Jackson's competition > Sullivan's.

    I think Jackson could have taken Sullivan sooner than 1888. Can we say 1887?