Top 35 All Time reveal - Boxing Survey Series

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Aug 2, 2020.


Page 8 of 32
  1. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,471
    15,789
    Jul 19, 2004
    :thumbsup:
    Thank you for that!

    On this note, once I get through the 9 lists, I'm going to do a much longer and more in-depth look at all of the results from the entire survey (as well as having some fun with some of the elite point tallies throughout, by sorting the data in various ways). I had always planned to do that, but McGrain and you have already provided me with a lot of thought-provoking themes that I may try and explore more thoroughly than I otherwise would have. And that's just after 1 single reveal.

    So you and others - please do continue with the healthy debates here regarding the results.

    And on that note, I'm hoping to have the Bantamweight reveal done in several hours.
     
    Rumsfeld, Aug 11, 2020
    Rumsfeld, Aug 11, 2020
    #106
    Saintpat and PhillyPhan69 like this.
  2. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,120
    26,098
    Jun 26, 2009
    I guess it’s too late for me to go back and vote Ricardo Lopez No. 1 at bantamweight. Dang it.
     
    Saintpat, Aug 11, 2020
    Saintpat, Aug 11, 2020
    #107
    Jel and PhillyPhan69 like this.
  3. Max12456789

    Max12456789 New Member Full Member

    5
    5
    May 21, 2020
    But surely that doesn't matter, because he was a middleweight by his era, if there was a super middleweight, he would fight there, but that would be like saying that if they introduce a super heavyweight, that Tyson Fury wasn't really a heavyweight, because he fought heavyweights.
     
    Max12456789, Aug 11, 2020
    Max12456789, Aug 11, 2020
    #108
    lufcrazy likes this.
  4. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,471
    15,789
    Jul 19, 2004
    This content is protected
     
    Rumsfeld, Aug 12, 2020
    Rumsfeld, Aug 12, 2020
    #109
    Saintpat, PhillyPhan69, lufcrazy and 3 others like this.
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,750
    47,572
    Mar 21, 2007
    Carlos Zarate above Herman and Harada makes me feel a bit sick, but overall, that's a great list, i'd say forum nailed it.
     
    McGrain, Aug 12, 2020
    McGrain, Aug 12, 2020
    #110
    Webbiano, Jel, Rumsfeld and 1 other person like this.
  6. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,126
    44,860
    Mar 3, 2019
    Good list. But Pintor > Zarate
     
    George Crowcroft, Aug 12, 2020
    George Crowcroft, Aug 12, 2020
    #111
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  7. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,471
    15,789
    Jul 19, 2004
    I recall you being down on Zarate.

    Whereabouts do you rate Dixon?
     
    Rumsfeld, Aug 12, 2020
    Rumsfeld, Aug 12, 2020
    #112
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,586
    21,202
    Sep 15, 2009
    It's amazing how thin a resume Zarate actually has when you look at it, in terms of opponents ranked when he faced them.
     
    lufcrazy, Aug 12, 2020
    lufcrazy, Aug 12, 2020
    #113
    PhillyPhan69, George Crowcroft and Rumsfeld like this.
  9. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,471
    15,789
    Jul 19, 2004
    Which do you take greater issue with? Zarate at 5? Or Pintor outside the Top 15?

    And are you @McGrain and @lufcrazy saying that the most 'objectionable' aspect of these tallies is Zarate?
     
    Rumsfeld, Aug 12, 2020
    Rumsfeld, Aug 12, 2020
    #114
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,750
    47,572
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yes, nowhere i'm afraid, he doesn't belong at bantamweight at all. Didn't make my top fifty. In fairness, categorisation at that time was really difficult, but i'm confident that under his own rules, Dixon was a featherweight, reflected in the huge swathe of featherweight title matches he fought at.

    At bantam, he fought in one title contest (off the top of my head).
     
    McGrain, Aug 12, 2020
    McGrain, Aug 12, 2020
    #115
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,750
    47,572
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yes, it's crazy. I, too, overrate him for his beastdom, but #4 is pretty sick.
     
    McGrain, Aug 12, 2020
    McGrain, Aug 12, 2020
    #116
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,586
    21,202
    Sep 15, 2009
    He was a beast to be fair. And with Herman, you have to really think about what you do with those losses of his, especially in terms of him being a top 5 ATG at the weight.
     
    lufcrazy, Aug 12, 2020
    lufcrazy, Aug 12, 2020
    #117
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  13. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,126
    44,860
    Mar 3, 2019
    Zarate top 5. I think both Carlos and Lupe are top 10-15 guys

    Normally I'm quite opinionated when it comes to stuff like this. But below 135, I kinda just curb that coz I know there's people who know so much more than me, an opinion I could heavily disagree with could just be a result of someone knowing a lot more about the guy than I do. But I did score Pintor-Zarate for Pintor, and so I think Pintor should definitely rate higher than Zarate.

    My list has definitely changed since the survey, and that's only coz I was thinking about guys like Sahaprom, Donaire, Rafa etc and wondering how they'd fit into a top 20 (they don't imo) and that lead to just redoing the entire list. It's ended up looking like:

    #20. Johnny Coulon
    #19. Lou Salica
    #18. Bud Taylor
    #17. Sixto Escobar
    #16. Jeff Chandler
    #15. Joe Lynch
    #14. Rafael Herrera
    #13. Chucho Castillo
    #12. Carlos Zarate
    #11. Lionel Rose
    #10. Lupe Pintor
    #9. Panama Al Brown
    #8. Memphis Pal Moore
    #7. Kid Williams
    #6. Terry McGovern
    #5. Pete Herman
    #4. Fighting Harada
    #3. Manuel Ortiz
    #2. Eder Jofre
    #1. Ruben Olivares
     
    George Crowcroft, Aug 12, 2020
    George Crowcroft, Aug 12, 2020
    #118
    BitPlayerVesti and Rumsfeld like this.
  14. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,586
    21,202
    Sep 15, 2009
    The problem with Dixon is the championship was split into different weights that all fought under the banner of featherweight.

    Like 114 pound titles, 118-120 pound titles etc.

    It wasn't really until Harry Forbes that people classed the two divisions as having two different names.

    Such a murky era.

    I mean there's times where someone would lose a title fight, but retain a claim at the same title but a lower weight limit.

    In the pre 1900s I can actually understand any and all positions on Dixon as a BW.
     
    lufcrazy, Aug 12, 2020
    lufcrazy, Aug 12, 2020
    #119
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,586
    21,202
    Sep 15, 2009
    Not actually had chance to watch the video yet.

    I'm looking forward to it.
     
    lufcrazy, Aug 12, 2020
    lufcrazy, Aug 12, 2020
    #120
    Rumsfeld likes this.
Page 8 of 32