Top 35 All Time reveal - Boxing Survey Series

Go to 7:15

 

Yeah, he's at 2 for both.

 

He's in 23 lists, not 24.

 

I fully expect to see more balanced top 10’s where we spot less flaws as we increase in weight. I would say WW up people seem to express having a more balanced knowledge as the weights increase. Many say feather and below they are not confident in their knowledge of those divisions, where I am probably more confident at Feather than I will be at LHW for example. My other area of weakness is pre 1930 and how determine/evaluate some of the fighters from those eras...

all in all this has been fun and the lists seem as solid as you can hope for from a bunch of amateurs like us lol. Looking forward to the next reveal

 

Sorry @lufcrazy I misunderstood your point there. I thought you were disappointed that Canto missed out on the top 15 overall. You meant, "every sane person out of the 24 should blatantly have Canto on their list." Apologies.

 

No worries, I think George got the wrong end of the stick as well.

 

Sorry mate but that’s a shocker.

 

Meh, horses for courses.

 

I like this list.

I don't personally have McFarland, Welsh or Armstrong in my top 10, but are in my top 15.

 

Another very solid list - there's no name in there that I take any personal issue with.

A question though about Armstrong - wondering what people were rating him on? Was it overall achievement or H2H? And if people placed him high here, does his welterweight place suffer as a result on their lists?

 

He did beat Beauhold, Venturi, Wright, Arizmendi and Ambers at LW, probably some other top ten type guys but I tend to stop counting after 5.

His loss to Ambers is controversial.

He held the championship and he fought as a champion in the division above whilst still being clearly able to make LW.