Rematch clause in a final eliminator?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by tee_birch, Aug 22, 2020.



  1. CaravanDweller

    CaravanDweller Member banned Full Member

    221
    447
    May 31, 2019
    100% agree
     
  2. Scissors

    Scissors Posts are sponsored by Matchroom Full Member

    9,363
    13,992
    Feb 11, 2018
    I don’t think you can pin the blame on solely the promoters. It’s the alphabets and all their stupid belts, rules and whatever else they make up along the way.

    Dillian DID deserve his title shot, whether that was against Fury now or Wilder over the past couple of years. Regardless of his ability he was number 1 and he deserves it for that alone.

    This is why the UFC have so much success. It’s the best vs the best, there’s no nonsense in between. If #2 beats #1 his next fight is a title fight, it’s as simple as that.

    Povetkin should now be mandated to face Fury in the next 90/120 days, Fury should not be elevated to a “franchise champion” to avoid a mandatory - as the WBC has implied that they would do.
     
    kojak, lordlosh, Popeye and 4 others like this.
  3. teddybaldock

    teddybaldock Active Member Full Member

    987
    863
    Oct 18, 2010
    The fact that povetkin won means he’s earned himself nothing but another fight with dillian whyte. And Dillon whyte is still one fight away from earning a shot at the wbc means dillian whyte has lost nothing and povetkin has only gained money/ gained nothing from a sporting perspective. So essentially what was the point in the fight last night nothings changed. Glad I never paid for it
     
    kojak, lordlosh, Popeye and 3 others like this.
  4. Heisenberg

    Heisenberg Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,991
    5,419
    Apr 30, 2017
    If I was Povetkin, I’d insist on a rematch clause should he lose the rematch that’s mandatory for him based on Whyte’s rematch cause... simple.
     
  5. Gomo

    Gomo Active Member Full Member

    1,095
    1,293
    Apr 1, 2018
    A rematch is absolutely the right thing.

    Povetkin didnt deserve to be in a final eliminator.

    How can pov come off a draw into an eliminator that's just bollocks.

    Whyte has been number 1 for ages and deserves the shot before Povetkin.

    So yes rematch is the right thing to do, luckily Eddie looks after his fighters and has got all this sorted.
     
    Willis Brown likes this.
  6. moog

    moog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,786
    5,987
    Mar 12, 2012
    Exactky. He clearly said the winners next fight would be Fury for the world title.
     
    lordlosh and Wizbit1013 like this.
  7. Scissors

    Scissors Posts are sponsored by Matchroom Full Member

    9,363
    13,992
    Feb 11, 2018
    This is not Hearn, Hearn is many things but it’s extremely unfair to land another WBC incompetency at his doorstep. All the quotes regarding it are directly from the WBC and Sulamain. They’re a joke organisation as constantly proven by the heavyweight mandatory situation, then we’ve had the Canelo and now Povetkin situation within the week.
     
    Heisenberg likes this.
  8. moog

    moog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,786
    5,987
    Mar 12, 2012
    I agree that the WBC are a joke mate, Sulamain couldnt run a bath let alone the WBC. But Hearn said the winner fights Fury next, when he know if Povetkin won he had to fight Whyte again.
     
    tee_birch, Twentyman and Wizbit1013 like this.
  9. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,997
    4,983
    Mar 22, 2015
    Why should people be surprised at this?
    It all stinks and we know it.
    I mean how more emphatic can a win be?
    Whyte was completely sparked, Povetkin should get the shot, but Hearn will drag this out.
    The rematch will be hyped and packaged as redemption or some **** sound bite like that in an attempt to get the mug punters to pay this time even more than 20 quid.
    It’s all a load of over hyped bollocks.
     
    Glenn McKrory and kojak like this.
  10. pow

    pow Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,502
    3,619
    Apr 26, 2014
    Eddie Hearn:

    "The first thing Whyte said to me after getting knocked out was make the rematch"

    Reality:

    "The first thing Whyte said to me after getting knocked out was where the **** am I!?"
     
  11. Scissors

    Scissors Posts are sponsored by Matchroom Full Member

    9,363
    13,992
    Feb 11, 2018
    But Hearn has no say, if he did then Whyte would have got his title shot ages ago.

    This content is protected
     
  12. Furey

    Furey EST & REG 2009 Full Member

    16,301
    6,161
    Oct 18, 2009
    Povetkin signed the deal with the rematch clause in place so he knew what to expect.

    Doesn’t feel right but clearly a smart move from Hearn
     
  13. pow

    pow Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,502
    3,619
    Apr 26, 2014
    Rematch clause to squeeze one last PPV out of Whyte. The casuals will lap it up after that Hollywood KO.
     
    kojak likes this.
  14. Wizbit1013

    Wizbit1013 Drama go, and don't come back Full Member

    12,297
    15,499
    Mar 17, 2018
    Sorry mate, but Hearns been saying all week in a sales pitch that "the winner goes on to face" Tyson Fury"

    Very sneaky but he didn't expect to get exposed as he thought Whyte was a shoe in to win
     
  15. Coybig

    Coybig Member Full Member

    495
    725
    Feb 22, 2020
    Very sneaky from Hearn and probably shouldn't be allowed but least it frees up Fury and AJ
     
    111Chris and Popeye like this.