Who do you rate higher Mike McCallum or Michael Nunn

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Eye of Timaeus, Aug 28, 2020.


  1. Eye of Timaeus

    Eye of Timaeus Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,893
    1,189
    Sep 1, 2019
    While Nunn was the more skilled McCallums resume is far greater imo and won a belt in 3 very competitive divisions.
     
    christpuncher likes this.
  2. CharlesBurley

    CharlesBurley Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,065
    1,880
    Feb 23, 2020
    Easy McCallum. Brains > No brains
     
    Toney F*** U likes this.
  3. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,767
    4,515
    Jul 14, 2009
  4. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,133
    44,917
    Mar 3, 2019
    McCallum. But Nunn would've beaten him.
     
  5. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,785
    46,474
    Feb 11, 2005
    Body Snatcher.... and it's not really close.
     
  6. bcr

    bcr Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,563
    1,440
    Dec 21, 2013
    Nunn is up there as one of my favorites but McCallum's resume is way deeper.

    Still, I think Nunn's resume is kinda underrated, many boxers have climbed the p4p lists and entered the hall of fame with worse opposition.
     
    Saad54 and Smokin Bert like this.
  7. CharlesBurley

    CharlesBurley Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,065
    1,880
    Feb 23, 2020
    NO
     
    christpuncher likes this.
  8. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,133
    44,917
    Mar 3, 2019
    YES
     
  9. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,425
    Aug 22, 2004
    I'd like to know where the idea that Nunn was " more skilled" than McCallum comes from. Not seeing how that makes sense. McCallum exhibited amazing, fluid skills on the attack, whereas Nunn was probably more adept at moving and slipping and dodging. It's probably harder to maintain fluid fundamentals on the attack while still remaining elusive as McCallum showed than anything Nunn gave us.

    McCallum all day.
     
    roughdiamond, Bujia, Devon and 2 others like this.
  10. CharlesBurley

    CharlesBurley Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,065
    1,880
    Feb 23, 2020
    This is fair, Nunn was a special talent and had very good wins
     
  11. CharlesBurley

    CharlesBurley Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,065
    1,880
    Feb 23, 2020
    Still NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
     
  12. CharlesBurley

    CharlesBurley Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,065
    1,880
    Feb 23, 2020
    Nunn definitely didn't have more skill. He did have far more athleticism but that doesn't mean he wins
     
    Cecil, Smokin Bert and salsanchezfan like this.
  13. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,425
    Aug 22, 2004
    Oh, I think he might beat McCallum but he's still not as "skilled."

    "Skill" is too often confused here with, as you say, athleticism and being a mover and general evasiveness. Correct execution of aggressive fighting is perhaps even more indicative of a truly skilled fighter. Hell, lots of fighters can run, that means nothing.

    But I get the impression we're in agreement on that.
     
  14. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,133
    44,917
    Mar 3, 2019
    The majority of the most skilled fighters ever are offensively based IMO.
     
    roughdiamond and salsanchezfan like this.
  15. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,425
    Aug 22, 2004
    Totally agree.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.