Floyd Mayweather jr. vs Sugar Ray Robinson (both prime)

Robinson never weighed below 145 after 23 years of age. Floyd didn't weigh 143 in the ring lmao, that's Pacquiao who rehydrated loads. Floyd weighed 137lbs on fight night vs Chavez when he was 24 years old.

There's 8lbs of difference there, and Robinson mostly weighed in at 147 to defend. He was mostly a 150lbs guy by that point.

 

You make up an absurd 23-year-old rule to try and get away from the fact. ROBINSON WEIGHTED 143 POUNDS At WELTER.
then you change the subject with Pacquiao in order to distract attention.
What are you talking about, silly boy?
And what do you know what Floyd weighed in the ring when he fought with a rule of 24 hours difference from the weigh-in, he could perfectly rehydrate from 135 to 143, you now admit that there is only 8 pounds of difference between them,
are 8 pounds of difference enough to be called so much bigger?

you dug your own grave

 

No I didn't lmao. Both of them had filled out by 23, hence why I picked that age. Both were clearly prime then too. I didn't make it up to avoid your shitty point. I 'made it up' because it's the perfect age to compare them at. Robinson didn't even weigh 143 in his prime. You've made that up.

No, I mentioned it in passing. Most people understand how social ques like work, clearly your IQ leaves a lot to be desired.

I know what he weighed in the locker room before the fight from HBO.

Watch the fights, you'll find that **** out. Maybe you'll stop looking like such a spastic on the process.

No, I threw you a bone. The lowest that Robi weighed whilst 23 years old was eight pounds heavier than the highest Floyd weighed at the same age. And 8lbs is still pretty substantial, few fighters win titles whilst giving up 8lbs. So yeah, Robinson is clearly bigger. We're comparing a lightweight to a welterweight. You're literally the only person who's questioned this. One guy was a super-featherweight champion, the other was a middleweight lmao

Why are you so ******ed when it comes to weights? First Charles and Patterson, now this?

You're a clown. Sym

 

Too easy.

 

Robinson a middleweight? Lmao what a ridiculous piece of crap kid.
He was not even a mw in the ring against lamotta.

My mistake was taking seriously the comment from this puppet and losing my time replying to this 15 years old child.
What do you like more ps4 or xbox?

 

If I kick your ass speaking in your own language if you spoke in mine you would probably leave the forum crying lmao

 

Sorry, do you deny that Robinson was middleweight champion? That's all I said. He was a middleweight for the Turpin fights, St. Valentine's Day massacre, Maxim, Graziano, Mims, Basora II, Olson (y'know, the fights where he was middleweight champion, he was a middleweight. )

No, you're mistake was trying to debate someone who knows 6x more about boxing than you. Then getting annoyed when it doesn't go your way.

 

You've never kicked my ass in any debate. Don't gas yourself up. You've spun yourself in to such a rage that you've been banned. TWICE. And boo hoo I don't speak Spanish.... how about you stop talking English and no-one has put up with your **** posts?

 

Being older doesn't make you smarter. If you use age argument, then you already lost the debate.

 

6x!!! Super goku kamehamehaaaa yahhh

Kids...

 

you are so ridiculous and you have so little personal life that you run from one theater to another to respond to posters with whom you have had previous discussions you are quite sad poor man hahaha

 

So another insults thrown due to lack of real arguments? Nothing new it seems

In one thread you raved about how much bigger Patterson was than Charles, but here when the difference is larger, it somehow doesn't matter.

 

Another example of the liar that you are here.
I never ever said that Patterson was "MUCH BIGGER" than Charles, i said that he was a little bigger, difference enough to make him a natural cruiser and Charles a lhw.
Dear, you are a manipulator and a liar

 

Who said that Robinson was "MUCH BIGGER" than Patterson? I mean, George Foreman was much bigger than Floyd, but the difference between smaller divisions aren't huge.

Using adverbs like "much bigger" or "much smaller" is highly subjective and you act like there is a definition of what "much bigger" means. You use non-quantible arguments and act like you are right, which is silly and it's actually you who tries to manipulate here (but it doesn't work).

That said, Robinson was clearly bigger and he had many physical advantages over Floyd. For some reason you can't accept this though.

 

And where did i ever compare Robinson and Patterson? I replied to your comment,(another of your typical lies) , i never said that Patterson was MUCH bigger than Charles, Robinson has nothing to do here.
Again you got exposed like an idiot.