I’m positive Holyfield would’ve beaten Tyson in 91

Just let that troll please he had mental issues and claim Tyson could beat Foreman,Liston,Ali....and punched harder than Shavers

 

Like he did with bum Tillis,Tucker?
Or like with Douglas?
Oh I forgott that Holyfield destroyed both of them inside of 4 rounds

 

He was so bad in his comeback that he finished Bruno earlier than in 80s?

 

Rooney knew the peek a boo style better than anyone, but even more important than that, he made sure Mike trained.
After Rooney left, Mike's skillset and especially his defense gradually declined.
Being in your physical prime means nothing if you don't train.

 

You're the biggest troll on this forum.

 

Really?
That's how he won against Bruno,Stewart...?

 

Said the guy who think that hyped paper chamop could beat Foreman,Liston,Ali,Frazoer,Marciano....and hit harder than Shavers....
You are not only troll but mental case clearly

 

You ******, peak Tyson was 86-88, so the Douglas fight is irrelevant. Tyson was not properly prepared for that fight and partied instead of focusing on boxing. Douglas was not prepared for Holyfield, being way overweight.
Also, the fact that Tyson beat some opponents harder than Holyfield did is irrelevant. Tyson also beat many opponents far easier than Holyfield did.
Styles make fights, you clueless ******.

 

It's a question of styles, Bruno was tailor made for him.

 

Tyson's KO ratio against proper HWs does prove he hit way harder than Shavers.

 

Nope he isn't perhaps Bruno beat McCall and gave Lennox all he could!
Tyson knocked Bruno faster in their second meeting so he was not past prime as you Tysonites wanted to show!

 

Tyson KO ratio against bums hahaha maybe!
But Shavers KO ratio against good contenders and Hall of famers proves he hit harder as facts that 3 of their mutual rivals stated Shavers hit harder!
HOFamer>>>>>bums like Lakusta,Scaff....