Worse 6 defenses and a title won in a row, is there any worse than Wilder?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ideafix12, Sep 3, 2020.


  1. johnmaff36

    johnmaff36 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,793
    576
    Nov 5, 2009
    he fought him. Twice. Even after being near murdered. How can that be held against him?
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  2. johnmaff36

    johnmaff36 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,793
    576
    Nov 5, 2009
    how many were ranked 1 or 2 when he was champ?
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,690
    21,302
    Sep 15, 2009
    The question was who was he hiding from, the answer was Liston.

    It's well documented.

    It isn't held against him, he fought Liston in the end.
     
    johnmaff36 likes this.
  4. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,181
    26,214
    Jun 26, 2009
    Your question was, and I quote: “Out of curiosity who would you say he (Patterson) hid from?”

    The answer is Liston. Sonny had to wait and wait and wait and finally Patterson did fight him. And it took less than 3 minutes before we saw why he was hiding from him.

    That’s why Floyd needed all those patsy defenses, because this was going to happen. Hell even Rademacher, who had zero professional fights, put Patterson on the deck.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  5. ideafix12

    ideafix12 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,010
    862
    Jul 30, 2010

    I mean, who were Mike Weaver’s first six defenses? Tony Tubbs? Ken Norton never even won a title fight. Etc.


    If Wilder had always fought top 5 or top 10 ranked fighters, he wouldn't have passed more than 2 defenses.
    All those fighters you named only fought or defended the title against real good fighters, not easy fighters like Wilder defenses.
    The only ranked fighter that Wilder beat was Ortiz in the first, and don't forget that the title was won by Stiverne against Arreola in a vacant title, neither of the 2 was in the top 15 of any coherent person at the time, coincidence the Stiverne's first defense is Wilder ...
    The movie is called how to buy a title
     
    Sangria likes this.
  6. johnmaff36

    johnmaff36 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,793
    576
    Nov 5, 2009
    i would suggest fighting the top banana available in 4 out of 6 defences, 'meaningful'. Look, i cannot argue with you over liston, you got me there, but at least he went on to fight him not once but twice
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,661
    28,975
    Jun 2, 2006
    Machen no1 Folley no2. in57
    Valdes no 2. in 58
    Liston no1.in60
    Machen no2.in61
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,661
    28,975
    Jun 2, 2006
    Sonny walked into D'Amato's office banged the table and said "is you or aint you gonna give me a title shot?"
    Cus prevaricated ,"you'll have to free yourself of your undesirable associates".
    Like he wasnt tied in with Fat Tony Salerno lol.
     
  9. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,075
    12,981
    Jan 4, 2008
    It certainly isn't. It's well documented that Cus wanted him to stay away from Liston, but that he faced him any way.
     
  10. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,690
    21,302
    Sep 15, 2009
    I thought it was obvious that the "he" referred to Team Patterson, apologies if that wasn't the case.

    I don't believe any professional fighter actually is scared or hides from anyone.

    But the team around them will advise which fights to take and which to not.

    In 1960 and 1961 Sonny was the top contender and Team Patterson tried avoiding the fight.

    As I've said in that very post you quoted, this isn't seen negatively as the fight obviously happened eventually.
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  11. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,075
    12,981
    Jan 4, 2008
    In '57 Jackson was ranked nr. 1 when Floyd faced him.

    In '58 I think actually Folley was the NBA nr. 1 and Machen nr. 2. Floyd choose to fight the nr. 3 - Harris.

    In '59 he faced Ingo, who was nr. 1 after destroying Machen.

    In '60 and '61 he was tied up in rematches with Ingo. He made a meaningless defence in the end of '61, but that was after three hard fights against his most dangerous opponent so far.

    In '62 he faced Liston.


    It's a bit curious why so much is made up out of this. Yes, Folley or Machen would have been a better defence than Harris, but other than that it's not that much to say. Since Floyd had the rematch clause with Ingo, the earliest Liston could have gotten a shot was in late '61, half a year or so before he got it.
     
  12. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,075
    12,981
    Jan 4, 2008
    Ok, fair enough.

    But it is an important distinction that Floyd felt that to honour the championship he had to go against his manager's advice. Not everyone has such a keen sense of honour about their title.
     
  13. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,075
    12,981
    Jan 4, 2008
    This sounds like a good story, but Sonny mainly had to wait for his shot because Floyd was tied up in rematches with Ingo. The year after that was settled he got it. Yes, he could have gotten it half a year or so earlier, but Floyd choose to take a soft defence after a very tough trilogy. Not the most outrageous thing ever.

    Ingo x 3 and then Liston, that's not an easy ride over four years.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,661
    28,975
    Jun 2, 2006
    Yes he did after he had milked the title for all it was worth, fighting the likes of Rademacher,McNeeley,London etc, and the public were calling Liston the uncrowned champion.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,661
    28,975
    Jun 2, 2006
    Liston could have been champion in 58,made a rack of defences and be recognized as the great heavyweight he was.
     
    George Crowcroft and JohnThomas1 like this.