Which former heavyweight champ had biceps smaller than 15 inches in measurement?

I don’t think Mark watches boxing honestly, I think he just watches the forum and accumulates opinions notes them down then plays them when required mostly he’s here because he likes the bodies of athletic men of all shapes and wants to discuss them with other like minded man watching physique loving...

This content is protected

 

Height has nothing to do with bicep size just the perception of them.

 

“Mike Tyson”

 

No? really?

 

It's seems very reasonable to me that the ratio of length and width of the bicep has meaning. An 18 inch width of the bicep will in general generate more force from, say, a bicep that's 10 inches long than from one that's 20 inches long. An extreme example, I know, but just to illustrate the point. The same principle of course applies for a bicep of 10 inches of length compared to one of (a somewhat more realistic) 15 inches. Or 9 to 13, etc.

And fighters with longer arms will of course have longer biceps in general.

 

Who cares? This isn’t bodybuilding muscularity is not an indication of fighting prowess see Bruno then see Riddick Bowe.

 

I know he’s gay, but thanks for the info!

 

You don't seem to have a clue about what you're responding to.

I was just saying that the measurement of Wilder's bicep should be seen in relation to his arm length. If you'd bothered to read the discussion you jumped into, you'd see that I actually used Wilder as an example of a huge puncher that didn't seem to have very big biceps to me. "Fighting prowess" haven't been mentioned at all.

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

Maybe the uppercut. Or help in a clinch. For whatever reason, people judge the bicep in sports more than they should. It's really useful of picking things up of weight. Probably helps at NFL Football, and Wrestling.