GGG vs James Toney at 160.

You write a constant stream of drivel. Your miniscule intellect has been left floundering and you have been reduced to hanging onto the coat tails of better posters than yourself for some scrap of validation. I can only laugh now as you try to pretend that you are anything other than a c-level poster.

 

My whole point was Toney has a better record than GGG.Any reasonable person would agree with that.you wrote endless pages of garbage to argue the unreasonable and made a complete fool of yourself.I am out of here as well

 

My point is that Toney's record at 160 is not better than GGG's. Despite your river of nonsense and delusion, you have failed to prove otherwise.

 

These guys are absolutely hopeless.


BCS8 and Mendoza:


"Mike was an old man"

"He was stiff and slow"

"Nunn gassed out"

"Toney struggled against his best opposition"

"Toney doesn't have a great MW resume"

"Graham did nothing"

"Watson did nothing"


Also BCS8 and Mendoza:

"Hey guys! Take a look at GG's GREAT resume and number of title defences that he had against:

Matthew Macklin
Martin Murray
Willie Monroe
Kell Brook
Daniel Geale


Ha!

Let us all take a moment to quickly review how these guys are doing so far in this stupendous debate:

https://images.app.goo.gl/Fkbe4ddGBrZth5un7

 

Yeah, because a knowledgeable fan would find it really difficult to distinguish what level of fighters Geale and Rubio etc were.

A real head scratcher.

 

More of your nonsensical and rambling rants? I left your offensive post alone. Don't make me open up a can on you.

 

He can't give answers to anyone.

It's either "Opinion" or an emoji.

 

With the quotes you just posted, this indeed ends with a crushing KO of these 2 clowns.End of debate.

 

How have you got the nerve to type that?

You are the one who is completely biased, who can't back up their opinions.

 

He can't even give Toney credit for beating Nunn.

That's what we're dealing with here.

The win somehow doesn't count, because Nunn was ahead before the stoppage.

He even has to outright lie and say that he was getting schooled before Nunn gassed.

He won't rate the win, yet he wants us to marvel at GG's incredible number of title defences over the likes of Macklin and Murray etc, whilst accusing people of having man love and being fan boys.

 

If Graham and Watson did nothing then Macklin, Murray and Monroe certainly didn't

 

Not to mention the basic, fundamental premise that being six rounds to four up, is only winning by one round.

 

Drilled me a new one?


I asked you to come back and refute what I'd said.

I gave you the opportunity to say what you disagreed with.

What happened?

You responded with:

"Opinion"


You have been smashed all over the thread by numerous posters.

Your only retort is to either type "Opinion" or post an emoji.


You should be embarrassed.

 

BCS8,

Opinion?

What level were they at then?

Enlighten us all with your great knowledge.

What evidence?

THIS EVIDENCE:

He'd just beaten Kalambay, Collins and Watson.

He went on to win a world title at a higher weight.

Toney had just beaten Reggie and Nunn.

Toney went on to beat Barkley, Thornton and Littles.

That is absolute proof that Mike was still an elite level fighter at the time he fought Toney.

If you don't agree, go and watch tennis.

Hilarious coming from a guy who can't give Toney credit for beating Nunn, whilst trying to shove wins over Murray and Geale down everyone's throat.

 

And that's your definition of a SCHOOLING??