Just need to say this clearly ----------> Lopez is an incredible, generational fighter with massive talent. Did not realize he's that good. My scores do not reflect how I feel about Lopez. He is the REAL deal. All props to him.
Looking for media scorecards and came across this. Newspaper guy. This is about my own view of Round 12: This content is protected Loma mostly on the front foot in Round 12. Thought Lopez tried hard, but Loma hard more in the round and landed cleaner and harder. Lopez rallied well from the beating in the 11th but not enough to take the 12th. That's how I saw it.
1. Lopez 10-9 2. Lopez 20-18 3. Lopez 30-27 4. Lopez 40-36 5. Lopez 50-45 6. Lopez 60-54 7. Lopez 70-63 - Lopez 8. Lomachenko 79-73 9. Lomachenko 88-83 10. Lomachenko 97-93 11. Lomachenko 106-103 12. Lopez 116-112 Lopez. 116-112 Lopez. Not a lot happened in the first so it could be scored for Lomachenko. Either way Lopez is the rightful winner despite some god-awful cards from clearly biased judges.
Mathematically your final tally includes an even round...and there we go, spotted it, you said Lomachenko in R10 but increased both men by ten points. Did you mean to have it 10-10 or 10-9 for Loma? If the latter your final card is 115-113 López.
Julie Lederman's card was awful, but can anyone explain how it is *relevant*? Even if she scored it 11-1 for Loma, he would have lost. And the other two cards were okay.
This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected Bob Arum had it 7-5 Lopez This content is protected This content is protected