why is Crawford's resume so bad?

His resume is already better than GGGs and Lomas

 

Anyone can be hurt "to the chin or body"

 

Then he should fight Spence

But no Spence would out -tough & stop him

Easy work

 

That'll depend on how Spence looks when he returns versus Garcia. He should beat Danny, but a layoff and an injury could hinder his abilities.

 

Crawford's best win is a B level Postol you clown.

 

Terence Crawford is a dosser

 

But is he a tosser?

 

It's not better than Loma's

 

Doubt it. Who's to say he doesn't want the fight?

 

If Postol is B level then so is Danny jacobs I challenge you to convince me otherwise.

Which of lomas wins were A level ? Little 40 year old rigo? Linares ? Campbell? If you think those are a level opponents your kidding yoursf

 

It's definitely not far off

 

He doesn't have a Russell Jr. On his resume. That's an A level, elite win right there. Crawford has none. Crawford has Postol as his career accomplishment.

 

Hell no.

Loma has Rigo, Pedraza, Linares, Walters, Russell Jr., Sosa, Campbell.

Crawford has Gamboa, Viktor Postol, Khan, Indongo, Horn.

Rigo, Walters and Russell Jr >>>>>> Any three best wins in Crawford's resume comfortably.

 

Russell is not an elite fighter and he's smaller than Loma. It may be lomas best win but I'm going to have to disagree that it's "elite a level"

 

Looks pretty comparable to me. Point and case lomas best win was a 40+ year old bantam weight at 130 lbs.

Your barking up the wrong tree. You'll never convince me the likes of Campbell, Pedraza and Walters are significant wins. They are just run of the mill contenders that your overrating to bolster lomas resume