With all the AJ vs Fury talk. Who do you consider the best HW Fury is Who is King now

Again I say, AJ has beaten 5 current top 20 ranked fighters Fury has beaten 1. I'm not saying that Fury would not beat AJ but at the moment as it stands I believe AJ is the king.
Fury has beaten the better? so you rate Wilder as a top heavyweight?
Why did Fury run away from the rematch with Klit?
You are a fan girl, & one that gets triggered by opinions not matching yours.

 

And again, you keep saying something that is irrelevant.

And you have a right to believe as you like, but the reasoning that you have presented is flawed, and at the time of this writing, 69% of respondents think that it is fury.

Yes, because he beat a better version of Kltischko.

A few short months ago, I would have said no. But Whyte just got rolled by a 41 year old, shot fighter. A slightly less shot version of that fighter is Joshua's second best win. Other than that, Joshua has Parker, who is now forgotten, Ruiz, who weighed in at 287 pounds, and Martin, who is a joke.

So I guess it is time to admit that the Wilder victory is looking pretty good.

it is a matter of public record that he had a drug problem.

Actually, you are the one voting against 69% of the site, so who are a fan *****.

Actually, I just refuted what you said. You are the one who started name-calling, so yes, I will point out that you are a *****.

 

Chisora is top 20

 

Pure Bias. joseph parker is a better win than a wilder win and so is whyte as he beat parker, chisora, and rivas. And povetkin is a beast, possibly an A level heavyweight even now. As a matter of fact wilder ducked povetkin didnt he lmao. The truth is if you look at wilders resume he has not beaten any top opponent what so ever. He's extremely overrated. All he has is a strong right hand

 

you can't be serious.
forget top 20 ranked fighters, fury, wilder and joshua have been the 3 main players for some time.
aj-wilder didn't happen but fury-wilder did...twice!

it's been three and a half years since joshua beat klitschko.
he's been fighting solid contenders while not fighting the two opponents that matter.

 

this is ridiculous.
firstly, parker is on no planet better than a wilder win.
and secondly, rock-paper-scissors is a laughable way of trying to justify what you're trying to say.

 

Explain how a win against wilder is better than a win againt parker when joseph parker has the better resume

 

No, nothing about those wins scream better, and again, 69% of respondents agree with me.

 

What screams better is a fighters style and their resume. Wilder has very low quality fundamentals and his resume is trash. He hasn't beaten one good opponent except arguably luis ortiz and he almost got pumbled by the old man in the first fight but the bell gave him grace in the 7th round. but then again who has luis ortiz fought ? Dillian whyte and joseph parker both have better fundamentals and a better resume than deontay wilder. Wilder is a one trick pony. A hell of a trick but once you take it away like fury did then he has nothing left to offer.

 

I don't like Wilder, but the past couple of years have shown that these other guys who are talking about are at a rough partiy, and aren't that good. Poveking is a guy who struggles with Hunter these days, and yet, he wiped Whyte out. Whyte barely beat Fat Andy, who split with Joshua, and on and on.

I hate to admit it, but Wilder is looking pretty good these days, all things considered.

I am not going to argue it all night, because it is actually sort of obvious. I like Joshua a lot, but his resume is not aging well at all. Who the man of the era is--who has the bragging rights--will be determined by direct confrontation with Fury.

 

I guess but that could be because wilder pretty much stayed out the mix. He got hurt be eric molina and practically went the distance with him. And yeah he KOd breazeale in 1 round but breazeale has trash defence and as a matter of fact breazeale had wilder hurt before then. Wilder should get in the ring wit ruiz or takkam or chisora or other top 20 opponents and then imo we can truly rate him

 

I am not defending Wilder--I was one of the first to point out that he was a fraud. I am simply saying that there is no way to point to Whyte, Parker, and late-thirties Povetkin as great, historical defenses, either. Sadly, Wilder has gained by the others losing.

 

What are you like the polls of boxing? 69%, he had a drug problem? no man he had a running away from the rematch problem.
I keep repeating myself and you keep getting triggered, who knows who wins between Fury & AJ but in my opinion, AJ has the deeper resume.

 

Hey man dont argue with this dude, he has 69% agreeing with him lol

 

"What are you like the polls of boxing?"

Are you drunk, now?

Guy, you started being insulting first, so don't play the victim. **** off.