Chris Eubank vs Freddie Steele

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Eye of Timaeus(2), Nov 25, 2020.


  1. Eye of Timaeus(2)

    Eye of Timaeus(2) Member Full Member

    122
    90
    Nov 6, 2020
    Steele was the better fighter but Eubank was the bigger man and tough as nails. Who wins this?
     
    Eye of Timaeus(2), Nov 25, 2020
    Eye of Timaeus(2), Nov 25, 2020
    #1
  2. Mod-Mania

    Mod-Mania Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,695
    2,874
    Aug 12, 2012
    Steele UD.
     
    Mod-Mania, Nov 25, 2020
    Mod-Mania, Nov 25, 2020
    #2
    roughdiamond, George Crowcroft, Clinton and 1 other person like this.
  3. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,490
    Jan 22, 2009
    Agreed. Workrate here
     
    Clinton, Nov 25, 2020
    Clinton, Nov 25, 2020
    #3
  4. Devon

    Devon Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,399
    5,579
    Dec 31, 2018
    Freddie Steele 160lbs, Chris Eubank 175-180lbs and Steele has the wrong style to fight a bigger man, espeecially when Eubank is very good at countering and setting up punches and is not slow at all
     
    Devon, Nov 25, 2020
    Devon, Nov 25, 2020
    #4
  5. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,406
    45,880
    Feb 11, 2005
    Unfortunately, you have some good points here.

    Steele was plenty crafty and athletic, and in his prime was nearing being unbeatable. I'll shade toward him but keep my wallet closed.
     
    Seamus, Nov 25, 2020
    Seamus, Nov 25, 2020
    #5
    Devon likes this.
  6. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,486
    80,690
    Aug 21, 2012
    I'd like to see more Steele footage myself.

    It's certainly within the reach of a guy like Steele to beat Eubank. They have similar styles in some respects, looking to explode and blast the other guy out. If I had to guess, probably Steele on workrate.
     
    BCS8, Nov 25, 2020
    BCS8, Nov 25, 2020
    #6