Prince Charles Williams vs James Scott

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Xplosive, Nov 21, 2019.


  1. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,306
    9,900
    Jun 23, 2008
  2. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,683
    2,560
    Oct 18, 2004
    James Scott by UD. Better comp.
     
  3. LoadedGlove

    LoadedGlove Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,527
    4,287
    Dec 6, 2019
    We didn't see Scott in the UK in his day but I've seen his win over Birmingham's excellent Bunny Johnson. Bunny was ranked 7 in the World at the time and Scott just forensically dismantled him. Scott even took Bunny's fast lead right full on the chin without blinking. That shot dropped Heavyweights.
    That version of Scott would have taken Williams apart in 4.
     
  4. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,306
    9,900
    Jun 23, 2008
    James Scott is not stopping Williams inside of 4. No way whatsoever.

    He wasnt a monster puncher and Prince was very tough.

    This fight has decision written all over it
     
    greynotsoold likes this.
  5. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,210
    15,233
    Jun 9, 2007
  6. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict

    5,487
    6,999
    Aug 17, 2011
    I agree, this fight goes the distance. Charles Williams knew how to fight, terrific jab, could fight inside. James Scott was a tough man, very determined.
    If Williams gets pulled inside and into a mauling fight, I think that it would go against him in the end. If he can hold his own inside but keep his distance and use his jab he can win the fight.
    I've watched Williams more recently than I have Scott so that may be a bias in my opinion.