Virgill Hill vs Joe Calzaghe

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by THE BLADE 2, Dec 23, 2020.


  1. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,832
    10,211
    Mar 7, 2012
    10-11 rounds?
     
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,793
    44,412
    Apr 27, 2005
    Close one on the cards either way. Hill has a little extra height and a fair amount of reach to make that jab a potential headache for Joe. Joe would be going after him tho looking to mix it up where he'd gain the advantage. Who can impose their style more often? Not much in it.
     
  3. HolDat

    HolDat Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,593
    2,743
    Sep 25, 2020
    Virgil Hill. Respect this man.
     
  4. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,247
    15,293
    Jun 9, 2007
    This for me too
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  5. Devon

    Devon Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,419
    5,610
    Dec 31, 2018
    Calzaghe would win on points, Hill's jab would be taken away because of the southpaw stance and Hill doesn't really have anything else on Calzaghe, I can't believe lots of people are picking Hill, Hill is overrated and Calzaghe is underrated, dare I say it, Hill is a mediocre fighter and Calzaghe is an ATG, In my view it is shocking that people are picking Hill, it's like me picking Felix Trinidad to beat Mayweather
    Hill was a world level fighter, but does not go down in history as a great fighter
     
    mark ant and Seamus like this.
  6. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,704
    4,451
    Jul 14, 2009
    You do know Virgil beat elite southpaws? Do your research first
     
  7. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    None of them were near Calzaghe`s level and they didn`t have Calzaghe`s hand speed and combo`s, Joe had a better workrate than anybody Hill ever fought.
     
    Devon likes this.
  8. Bah Lance

    Bah Lance Active Member banned Full Member

    1,089
    1,362
    Apr 29, 2019
    When I think of fighters that could beat Calzaghe...

    A conventional technician doesn't figure into that.
     
    gollumsluvslave likes this.
  9. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,527
    46,095
    Feb 11, 2005
    When I think of fighters who could beat Calzaghe...

    I achieve complete emptiness of thought and consciousness.
     
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,793
    44,412
    Apr 27, 2005
    Hill is not a "mediocre" fighter.
     
    George Crowcroft and Loudon like this.
  11. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,832
    10,211
    Mar 7, 2012
    How is it shocking picking Hill?

    A mediocre fighter?

    Joe wasn’t as great as what you think.
     
  12. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,704
    4,451
    Jul 14, 2009
    You do not think Maske was on Calzaghe’s level at 175? what has Joe done at 175 to be ranked on another level?
     
  13. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    His punch variety was medicore compared to Calzaghe`s, 90% of his punches were jabs, the fighters he beat were medicore also.
     
    Devon likes this.
  14. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Maske was overrated, prime Kessler was better and b-hop still had enough left when he fought Calzaghe to beat a prime Maske, fighters at 175 during the 90`s mainly relied on athleticism Joe had a better fight IQ than any light heavy from the 90`s.
     
  15. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,704
    4,451
    Jul 14, 2009
    I would not call Maske, Tiozzo or Czyz mediocre.
     
    Loudon and AwardedSteak863 like this.