Which Current Lightweights Beat Lightweight Manny Pacquiao...???

The best fighter who ever lived doesn't get beat by a faded erik Morales. Stop!

 

Don’t work like that, all the greats were beat by lesser fighters, unless they cherry picked. Erik morales is also an atg

 

I do believe Lopez has more thudding power than Pac (he's simply bigger). This isn't to say I don't think Pac is a hitter, he most assuredly is, it's just that I think Pac's speed, force, angles etc........created a lot of his (power at the higher weights). I constantly think about David Diaz saying how "it wasn't the power, it was the speed" when he was getting dominated by Pac in their fight. I don't think Loma would be as gun shy as Lopez dwarfed him and Pac wouldn't. I think, he'd struggle with Pac's speed and angles, Pac's so hard to anticipate.

 

Too many loses. Never beat JMM clearly and got KTFO by him. Lost to Bradley and a trash Horn. Lost to his biggest rival in PBF by a wide decision and I won't even bring up his other losses. He's no where in the class of SRR Armstrong Ali Greb Pep Duran SRL and others.

 

Erik Morales was on steroids when he fought Maidana and Pac was not green when he lost to a faded Erik Morales, stop!

 

Yes stop!

 

He was not green though that is an excuse. Erik Morales was shot in the rematch and the last fight they mean nothing.

 

All them fighters you mentioned lost loads and none of them had elite longevity like PAC, spanking younger men for fun. Ali couldn’t beat Ken Norton clearly, far from an atg, Mayweather only picked Pac because “ he seen something “ and knew pac was not the same. I still can’t believe he admitted that. You get all them pretenders you listed, get their achievements and then put Pac’s next to it, it’s going to make you realise. No room for opinion his achievements are factual and can not be argued. Do it and then thank me for this

 

Pimps a modern day boxing fan, lose and your ****

 

NONE of them take the David Diaz version. I'm not sure if any of them even last the distance with that version.

 

Where do you get off saying this stuff? PBF tried to make the fight with Pac but Pac turned him down over testing he pulled out he didn't want the fight. PBF saw something in Pac years ago the guy couldn't beat a faded Erik Morales FFS and struggled with JMM. You have to be out of your mid to think a guy who lost to those fighter is going to give a master like PBF a loss. It's wishful thinking mixed with hate of PBF. Pac will always lose to PBF because he has no answer for the way PBF can control range and dictate distance on him that's the real reason any version of Pac will never beat PBF. When will you realize this? PBF is a better than Pac period. Pac lost to Horn you can't wish his loses away simply because they don't fit your narrative. He's not greater than any of those fighters I listed period he's not even the best fighter of his era PBF is. If you want to start talking about longevity then you might as well say Hopkins is the GOAT then.

 

Loses matter especially bad ones. You sound like a novice casual and a excuse maker.