Who has the better Resume? Fury or Big Dosser Femi?

Holy **** you're biased as ****. With your logic who has Wilder beaten besides dinosaur Ortiz ?

Fury's wins

Wlad: never engaged and fought in the most boring world title fight ever seen.
Wilder: technically limited piece of trash that ducked Whyte and is Overrated and has 1 good win
Chisora: got beat by Pulev And Whyte

See how biased that sounds ?

If you hate Joshua just say that

 

I have to get out of the british forum and clense my eyes

 

I’m Joshua (femi)’s number 1 fan cobber

 

Looks at Wilders resumes and lack of quakity opposition. I'd back Chisora to beat all of Wilders wins. Didn't struggle against Spzilka like he did too. I dont think Chisora woukd struggle against Washington either like Wilder did.

 

Seems fella I don't need to put you straight because others have already shown you the error of your ways. You've clearly shown your bias tho. ' comeback = allowed' and x2 eh!? This is your attempt at displaying how Fury's resume is better!? Please!!!

Oh and Andy Ruiz ain't 39 yet either BTW!,

 

And what basis do you have Wilder as World class!? Barring two defeats (as I'm sure you'd have it) to Fury, what makes him world class in your opinion!? Or is that just more bias to boost Tysons pretty weak resume!? He has Klitschko, Pudding Chisora and an untried and barely tested Wilder. Facts. Christian Hammer!! Lmfao

 

'beat Price' hahahaha

 

Look I could sugarcoat Joshua's resume, the same way if you want

Pulev= undefeated since loss to WK
Ruiz= unified HW champ of the world
Parker= wbo World champ.

I'm sure you get the point. But I'm not saying Joshua is any better than Fury just he has the better resume as the title asked.

And @Who_Necks yes barely tested is the best way to put it, but he hasn't tried himself against the best has he!? We all know he only agreed to fight Fury in the first place as he was obese and suffering from mental health issues! What a guy, a true champ move!!

 

No

You are completely dismissing how difficult it can be to go over and rip a title from a favoured Champion in his own backyard

Its not as cut and dry as you seem to be making out

 

It's hilarious how some ppl try and rate absolute bums like Dominic Breazeale, Charles Martin and Carlos Takam as good wins whilst at the same time try to say Otto Wallin and Chisora are ****. Wallin would beat all three of those he's a quality boxer, and Chisora has always been solid.. recently a top 10 ranked heavyweight:. Much better than his losses column suggests, he should have wins over Whyte and Helenius.

 

That’s fine but Lewis isn’t part of this question.

Fury’s wins of Wilder and Klitschko are the two most impressive wins that either has - but Joshua’s CV has better depth in the context of this era imo.

 

Mitchy has gone on a one man PR campaign on this forum to try and discredit the Wilder win for the best part of a year. It’s quite sad really, regardless what you think of Fury - it’s absolutely obvious the Wilder win was impressive.

 

The era is full of puddings with Fury only facing a proper challenge with outcome uncertain from 3 fighters - he done Klit and Wilder leaving Tony Dosh PPV.

It does not matter to me how many Burgers Andy Ruiz munches - he will always be a fat mess and the same principle applies to puddings.

Joshua has a CV with only one decent test while Fury has three all away from home - the rest are puddings on both CVs.

Now Usyk is on the horizon for a good test for both and hopefully a few decent contenders emerge before Fury and Tony Dosh PPV sail off with all the PPV Loot.