The aforementioned names and reasons I listed are still valid that his resume wasn't that impressive. Perhaps you need to look a bit more into those on his resume..ah the 35 year old Briscoe coming into the fight with 16 losses, ah Eugene Hart coming into the fight with 6 losses and one good win... Fantastic resume.. Look at the context
He lost on the judge's scorecards because of corruption rearing its ugly head again. There's no way in hell he didn't deserve to come away with at least one win from their two fights but when you fight Clenelo you're fighting his judges too.
Trouble? GGG would have Nunn. In all seriousness Golovkin might find himself in an early hole, yes, but I'd have a very hard time justifying picking Nunn here.
I believe we are matching them as the best version of themselves and it’s not difficult for me to see Nunn wins everyday of the week. Styles make fights and skills matter. Pimp C is not only a Baller, Pimp C knows boxing and for you to bracket him with me is an honour and compliment. I like a lot of what you post George but I do have an issue with the reverence attributed to GGG on this forum as he is not the indestructible unstoppable machine some want to make him out to be.
Come on stop that crap. Canelo won the fights due to his better and more versatile skills. The fights may have been close but Canelo for me won clearly both times. Before you ask I was not drunk on the night of the fights.
Again, very few people agree with you, Olu. And it's completely pointless wasting my time debating this with you.
Yeah, look at the context. Briscoe was coming off a close fight with the number one contender, and just stopped another contender in Chiaverini. He was only a year removed from one of his best performances, vs Barr. And Hart was a collosal puncher, who's reminiscent of Lemieux, which is why I mentioned him. He fought in a different era people lost more because they fought more often. Saying I need to look into his resume more is a great laugh. You didn't even include some of his best wins, it's blatant your knowledge of Hagler's record can be found on his boxrec. Furthermore, it's still a helluva lot better than Golovkin's.
Nunn looks good at the start of the fight. Landing blitzing combinations and dancing away from GGG's attack but he won't be able to keep it up because GGG's pressure would be too much for him and when he can't get away, I see a bad ending for the lanky fellow.
He is a very good boxer your cousin but I just cannot take to him as a person unlike your other cousin Tyson Fury. I love Tyson Fury he is my kind of guy. I see he has knocked up Paris again. Can’t say I blame him though any man lucky enough to be married to Paris will keep knocking her up.
Look I am not interested in whether people agree with me or not. This is not a popularity contest. This is exchanges of opinion on boxing.
And I take all these people's opinions far more seriously than I do the opinions of haters and corrupt judges and corrupt judging is as synonymous with Clenelo's name as ginger hair is This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected