How? They chose that location and gave in. Eubank never gain in, even against Thompson. He’d of faced Jones when he was title-less. Most would’ve quit in his title-winning fight with Benn with those injuries. Let alone the Watson (rematch) fight.
Anyone who abandons their own land/people of origin for a 'better life' amongst foreigners doesn't have the right to call anyone else weak. Eubank is a fraud of epic proportions. Hopefully he dies soon.
Ok but eubank is from the 90s and was the wbo champ in the 90s when that wasn't considered a legit belt so it's not like eubanks era was very different. There was plenty of ducking in the 90s too. Eubank literally confirms he avoided Roy and toney in the interview bc they weren't mandatories and he "wasn't suicidal" ... that's called ducking All this interview "confirms" is that eubank is a giant narcissist who wants to relive his glory days over and over with his photocopy son and constant retrospective interviews
Ducking is what Hagler, Collins and Jones did to Graham, Calzaghe and Nunn respectively. Eubank never did that. Actually giving up a title when the mandatory was a tough assignment is literal ducking.
It's also how you beat your opponents? What like how Fury had a close boring fight with 39 year old Wladimir and won the winning rounds by 1 or 2 marginal jabs or 1 or 2 scuff dangly armed inside glove hooks? (reminder this is the first person Wlad fought that he was bigger/own size and the first person he couldn't clinch to death) Or do you mean the first Right Hand man fight where Fury obviously won, but won by 1 or 2 jabs per round in a fight where punch landed volume was ridiculously low? Or do you mean the second Wilder fight? You know where the fight before, Wilder was getting piece up and made to look stupid by 50 year old man round by round before the old man got too confident and was laid out. Eubank senior may be delusional but thinking Furys resume is impressive is even more so
