How close to prime was Jersey Joe vs Marciano?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KeedCubano, Mar 1, 2021.


Which Is It?

  1. Shot to Pieces

    2.3%
  2. Past Prime a Lot

    4.7%
  3. Past-it But Still Quality

    72.1%
  4. At The Tail End of His Prime

    16.3%
  5. Centre/Near Middle of His Prime

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. Absolute Peak

    4.7%
  1. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,298
    4,629
    May 13, 2014
    My recent article on the fight. https://imgur.com/gallery/Ox5by7z
     
    Bokaj and LoadedGlove like this.
  2. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,217
    80,308
    Aug 21, 2012
    I'm a Marciano fan and I have no problem with that assesment. Rocky simply wasn't a great boxer, and he could be outboxed. It's the truth. He was great in other areas, notably stamina, determination and punching power. He's the definition of a "take them to the deep end and drown them" boxer.
     
  3. Somali Sanil

    Somali Sanil Wild Buffalo Man banned Full Member

    6,555
    7,570
    Sep 1, 2019
    Good post. I can’t see JJW ever beating Marciano. Perhaps if they fought 5x he might get a decision in one
     
    BCS8 and Bah Lance like this.
  4. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,126
    44,867
    Mar 3, 2019
    You're the sane kind. The rare kind...

    It's the others that Ferguson needs to worry about.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  5. Bah Lance

    Bah Lance Active Member banned Full Member

    1,089
    1,362
    Apr 29, 2019
    If he was ever gonna beat him, that first fight was the time, the Rock just had an extra gear.
     
    RockyJim, BCS8 and Somali Sanil like this.
  6. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    18,964
    20,325
    Jul 30, 2014
    I'm genuinely curious as to why Mcvey was permabanned but not this pisspoor excuse of a poster.
     
  7. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,942
    24,873
    Jan 3, 2007
    I don’t think he was near prime but very well prepared for that first evening.
     
  8. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,649
    Dec 31, 2009
    Walcott is difficult to assess.

    Here is a very talented fighter who was probably always good enough to be a champion. Very early on Joe Louis’s management were looking at Walcott before deciding on Louis. I think Blackburn selected Walcott but he got ill so they turned to Louis.

    So without the funding walcotts career had stalled because he wasn’t able to reach his potential until he got the proper funding. He had a day job and a family. So He retired without approaching his potential. Years later, after the war, he got relaunched. Once he got this opportunity Walcott was always in such excellent shape but also fought in a reserved style so as to preserve the remainder of his career.

    Walcott had been held back so long, It was like he was even holding something back in the ring. A lot of close fights he might have won easier. It is probably why it took him a lot of title fights to finally land the championship. He took rounds off against Louis when he had the fight won. The second time he decked Louis, thought he had it won again, he stalled for time and got too confident. Paid a price. Later It took him 3 fights to bite the bullet and beat Charles with a kayo. The forth fight he used more aggression and got a close decision.

    I watched an interview with Teddy Bremner once. He said Walcott was always a slick, spoiler, kind of a fighter until the Marciano fight which he called “Walcott's greatest fight”.

    Around the time he fought Rocky, Walcott still knew he had one great fight left in him. He’d always held back one performance like that because he knew how damaging it is to fight that way. But defending the title he had fought so long and hard to win brought it all out. Walcott fought like a man possessed because he still had enough left in him to fight like that.

    was it his peak? No. But he had never fought like that until then. Walcott was a tiger against Marciano.

    if he had been physically better previously, he probably hadn’t been harder to beat than he was that night.

    However, Walcott paid a price for that. He had emptied the well. It’s fair to say Marciano was fortunate that there was not another performance left in Joe for the rematch. Maybe if he had Walcott would have won.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2021
    shza, BCS8 and Jackomano like this.
  9. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,061
    45,315
    Feb 11, 2005
    He was a journeyman whose laudable persistence paid off when the quality of the division receded to his level.
     
  10. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,126
    44,867
    Mar 3, 2019
    I'm honestly amazed at how well you can lie to yourself.
     
    BitPlayerVesti likes this.
  11. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,649
    Dec 31, 2009
    I don’t think it’s that simple. If it was then it must have been the same for Archie Moore, George Foreman and Joe Brown or Saoul Mamby.
     
    RockyJim likes this.
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,061
    45,315
    Feb 11, 2005
    When one actually does research and reviews what was being said of Walcott during his career, one discovers "journeyman" is the tag that was being hung on him and that he was seen as guy who hung around long enough for the division to hit a lull where he achieve.

    You are lying to yourself if you deny this.
     
  13. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,096
    Oct 28, 2017
    How many of this lot do you rate as a better heavyweight than Jersey Joe Walcott?
    Stanley Poreda
    Charley Retzlaff
    Young Stribling
    Ernie Schaaf
    Larry Gains
    Walter Neusal
    Paulino Uzcudun
    Tommy Loughran
    Abe Simon
    Billy Conn
    Lou Nova
    Tommy Farr
    Bob Pastor
    Buddy Baer
    Elmer Ray
     
  14. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,631
    Mar 17, 2010
    Wtf Walcott was a great fighter in great shape.
    He was one of the toughest and best boxers to ever enter the ring.

    Marciano KO Wlad in 3

    Anyone voting past prime is a bozo that has clearly never been to a gym where the high guard is the norm, and where people double up their jab while moving their front foot forward 3.2 inches (not a damn centimeter more or less).

    If you asked everyone in the Mayweather gym to pick between Floyd and Rocky, Rocky would easily win 55% of the votes. Wake up people.

    *faints*
     
  15. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,631
    Mar 17, 2010
    I’ve done my research, and Bert Sugar said Walcott was the greatest. Pack it in, you’re done here.


    *faints*