New clinching rules.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by james5000, Apr 19, 2021.


  1. james5000

    james5000 2010's poster of the decade Full Member

    9,521
    3,631
    Apr 11, 2010
    Ban clinching
    Clinching equals instant point deduction
    3x clinch equals disqualification

    Sounds good to me!!!

    Who are the new top dogs?
     
    Ph33rknot and SheenLantern like this.
  2. jaytxxl

    jaytxxl Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,557
    3,470
    Mar 1, 2010
    A lot of careers would’ve been different had they not have been able to strategically use clinches as apart of their offensive/defensive arsenal.
     
    JunlongXiFan and HolDat like this.
  3. james5000

    james5000 2010's poster of the decade Full Member

    9,521
    3,631
    Apr 11, 2010
    True but the greats will always be great.
    All sports amend rules over time and it doesn't diminish greatness.

    Some sports change because there are people so dominant that the game becomes unfair.

    Apparently Wilt Chamberlain used to slam dunk free throws lol
     
    JunlongXiFan and Boxed Ears like this.
  4. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    92,809
    27,503
    Jan 18, 2010
    Tell that to Ali then... he was notorious for clinching, certainly from age 30 on.
     
    boxfap, Ph33rknot, BCS8 and 6 others like this.
  5. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    55,525
    9,875
    Jul 28, 2009
    I just personally want to thank you for knowing that 'dominate' and 'dominant' are different words and only one of them fits the sentence you used one of them in-wait-only one of them in of which and that of you used. I don't know how to make the sentence I'm typing. I'm sorry. Anyways... You have restored my faith in this forum. And me, having taken away the faith in so many other people using the forum, I guess I have a lot to learn about that. Thank you.
     
    Clinton and sasto like this.
  6. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,085
    Feb 16, 2013
    i don't think we need new rules, the rules are there, clinching or holding is part of the sport, i believe it's a skill to tie somebody up, especially if you're hurt, buzzed or in serious trouble.

    Also, fighting inside is a skill, if somebody has you wrapped up, it can be very difficult to get a arm/hand free and work, it's actually very difficult to work an angle and create space or just turn a fighter, it takes a lot of practice and sometimes it just comes with experience.

    I personally don't mind it, so long as it isn't constant and isn't a fighters main tactic, if a fighter is just jumping in to grab and maul, spoil then it's a problem.

    We just need consistency and stronger referees, if you get those two things working together then those moments won't happen as often and won't be as frustrating.

    The consistency is key, then we all understand the rules, understand what will be tolerated, fighters will eventually referee themselves so to speak, if a fighter 100% knew there would be a point taken and maybe worse if they constantly hold them they just wouldn't do it.
     
  7. Dannymita

    Dannymita Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,943
    9,665
    Jan 21, 2019
    Jesus Andre ward woulda been ****ed


    On a serious note...don't ban clinching....as someone pointed out earlier...clinching when hurt is a skill...but they should definitely make moves to take points for excessive clinching because some people are ridiculous.....tying up as soon as someone is with 2 feet of you...andrade being most recent example...run run run...get low ,come up forward tie up...boring ****
     
  8. sasto

    sasto Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,534
    16,088
    Aug 5, 2020
    It's tough to make a consistent rule because some matchups produce exciting inside fighting and others it's only spoiling, but it's one of those thing you know it when you see it but what would a rule look like?
     
    N17 likes this.
  9. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,085
    Feb 16, 2013
    Yeah good point and I get that, but a good referee should know what he is looking at, he should understand what's going on, he is closest to the action so should know if a fighter is hurt, buzzed, If it's just natural coming together.

    But if you just get one fighter jumping in, grabbing, clinching, not looking to work but just to spoil.. take Okolie for example, there have been many moments when he has literally jumped in and grabbed.

    We start there, if it's blatant, consistent spoiling then a strong referee should instantly warn, then take a point, none of this continuous warnings, long chats and finger waving.

    Stronger referee and more consistency.

    But I understand what you're saying, sometimes it just happens, it can be just done to styles or even a tactic clash.. but there are still rules there, a lot of it is down to the referee's discretion and that's when it becomes a real problem for me.
     
    sasto likes this.
  10. jaytxxl

    jaytxxl Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,557
    3,470
    Mar 1, 2010
    There is some cases where the excessive clinching certainly should have been considered for disqualification. Perfect example is Wlad vs Povetkin that was maybe the most ridiculous one I can remember. Good examples of using a clinch at the right time would be when Mosley buckled Floyd or when Thurman buckled Porter. Those were examples where th fighter was on unsteady legs after taking a huge shot and immediately clinched to recover. Wlad just clinched and leaned on Povetkin the whole fight.

    Somebody brought up Ali. The Ali vs Frazier rematch is never talked about because Ali clinched 133 times which made the fight beyond unwatchable.
     
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2021
    Surrix and sasto like this.
  11. james5000

    james5000 2010's poster of the decade Full Member

    9,521
    3,631
    Apr 11, 2010
    Weirdo
     
  12. james5000

    james5000 2010's poster of the decade Full Member

    9,521
    3,631
    Apr 11, 2010
    He will always be a great of his era.
    Doesn't mean he would be a great now.
     
  13. james5000

    james5000 2010's poster of the decade Full Member

    9,521
    3,631
    Apr 11, 2010
    Clinching is a skill but it makes for a less entertaining spectacle.

    A fighter who is buzzed can still clinch.
    He will just lose a point.

    Probably better than taking a knee. Might get a 30 sec break as the ref will be obliged to take a point.

    Talented inside fighters would be the most rewarded. Hit and hold specialists wouldn't be so lucky.
     
  14. Surrix

    Surrix Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,822
    2,116
    Sep 16, 2020
    Okolie vs Askin is even a bit better example.
    Clinch and holding is nothing new, before WW2 and especially before WW1 this was common thing in boxing.
     
    jaytxxl likes this.
  15. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    55,525
    9,875
    Jul 28, 2009
    What? I was complimenting you, you gormless cymling. It's not my fault I can barely articulate compliments. I've got some zinc overdose problems that were a result of a homemade protocol I underwent to prove the lie of the children of the lie, man.
     
    BCS8, james5000 and Clinton like this.