3. Dont have excuses if Andrade beats him. But most likely you will, given the excuses you just laid down.
Maybe someone 48+ y.o will be more comfortable for him? At least we might worship even fights with 50+ opponents if enough big names.
Sure, but im not going to use that as an excuse as to why he could possibly lose that fight. If im using your logic he is still good enough to beat Andrade in his current form, so if he was to lose, he just lost to the better man. No excuses.
Well if Golovkin was to lose to Andrade I would have no excuses as I never made any. Golovkin is old, he’s been inactive, certainly declined but I still think he beats him, they’re not excuses just facts, he loses it is was it is.
It just seems like a cop out to say an Old GGG beats Andrade, but at the same time when Andrade wins its because GGG's old lol. Andrade should be a heavy favourite
But I never said that, reading comprehension obviously is not your strong point and you’ve jumped into a conversation midway through. What I said was prime GGG brutalises Andrade, this version whilst older and has declined (which isn’t a lie) still beats him. At no point did I say that if Andrade beats him it’s because he’s old you ****ing idiot.
I can read, and agree you never "SAID" that. Pretty obvious to anyone why you mentioned his age and decline though. A ready made excuse
But it’s a fact not an excuse. An example of an excuse is losing a pen to hide away from signing a contract to a fight in which you never really wanted. Ive stated facts and if they were to fight and Golovkin loses it is what it is, I would not lose no sleep over it at all. Reading comprehension son, try to learn it.
Prime GGG beats any current fighter at MW/SMW. Andrade would have ducked that GGG like so many others did.