Sugar Ray Leonard and Muhammad Ali were both showboaters. Which of them was the better fighter?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Apr 26, 2021.



  1. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker Full Member

    24,273
    7,637
    Jul 15, 2008
    Excuses , excuses. Every major trains said the same thing on Ali .. he did everything wrong, got by on supernatural reflexes till they failed then on toughness and ended up a vey sick man from all the punishment he took because he lacked boxing skill and stayed around too long ..
     
    White Bomber likes this.
  2. Balder

    Balder Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,881
    1,865
    Nov 10, 2012
    Ali was a battleship

    Leonard was a dingy.

    Ray only fought a few people in their primes , Ali was so good, he not only fought the best, he mocked them.

    Different league entirely - Leonard would showboat only when he was outclassing his opponent, or trying to make them mad. Ali, mocked and showboated before and then during his matches. I was just a whole different level .
     
  3. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Duran hit Ray more than li ws hit by Jones, Mildenberger or Foley as did Hagler and Kalule.
     
  4. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker Full Member

    24,273
    7,637
    Jul 15, 2008
    Natural skills or boxing skills ?
     
  5. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,293
    6,967
    Oct 25, 2006
    Duran is in another stratosphere to those guys. As is Hagler. Kalule is superior too. I can't believe you're trying to make a case built around that argument.
    I watched FOTC again last night.
    It's insane how often Frazier caught Ali. He could barely miss.
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,297
    9,963
    Jan 4, 2008
    Both, of course. There is no and/or for any great fighter ever. Ali had both, but relied heavily on his natural skills, as we all know.

    Surely, you do understand that this isn't black or white, just the one or just the other?
     
  7. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,297
    9,963
    Jan 4, 2008
    Yeah, that left hook found its mark many times. It should be said that he often ate a lot of shots to get into position to deliver it, though.
     
  8. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Ali was in better condition in the rematch and fought better, Frazier threw more shots in that fight than Hagler or Kalule did v Ray, Leonard moved much more v Hagler than Ali did v Frazier and threw a lot less shots leaving him less open to counters, he also landed a lot less v Hagler.
     
  9. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,293
    6,967
    Oct 25, 2006
    I'm not sure what your argument is. Leonard moved more against Hagler therefore he got hit less? He left himself less vulnerable to counters?
    Isn't that the point?

    Ali was in great condition for FOTC. You don't go 15 rounds at that pace taking those shots otherwise.
    He got hit alarmingly often by Frazier, who essentially threw one kind of punch in the fight, the hook.
    Sorry to say, but any other fighter other than Ali would have been crucified for not being able to deal with just one punch.

    Look at the swarming pressure Ray had to deal with, from a two-fisted aggressive ATG in Duran. He dealt with it far better than Ali did, who basically took shots because he couldn't negate the hook.
    Yeah he lost, though not by much, but he didn't have to ship shots like Ali did.

    Only a shot Leonard took the kind of punishment Ali took against Frazier and others.
     
  10. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Not during the 60`s while world champ, aside from the Chuvalo fight,
    Chuvalo reminisced about his fighting days with detailed memory and the insurmountable pride which still resides within him during a recent Best I’ve Faced interview with RingTV.com.

    Best overall: Muhammad Ali in 1966. Although his quickness was outstanding he was able to absorb a great shot and he tricked you in the ring. You could hurt Ali and never know it. By his own admission I had him in trouble once or twice, but I didn’t take advantage. I only had 17 days notice for that fight, and if I’d had an extra month of preparation then that would have helped me a lot.
     
  11. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Ali wasn`t in great condition v Frazier and wwas quicker in the rematch, he was also past his prime, Ray moved too much v Hagler and didn`t throw enough punches, Ali landed far more v Frazier by comparison.
     
  12. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,297
    9,963
    Jan 4, 2008
    Yeah, the 60's Ali was harder to hit, no doubt. I don't think Chuvalo hit him that much either tbh. Fair amount of low blows, though.
     
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2021
  13. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Ali was a bit heavier for that bout too.
     
  14. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,297
    9,963
    Jan 4, 2008
    Yeah, 215. But still lean and light on his feet.
     
  15. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,293
    6,967
    Oct 25, 2006
    You're just repeating yourself. Your logic here has severe holes in it.
     
    he grant likes this.