Why are you absolutely terrified of acknowledging foul play on Floyd's end? When you are presented w/ facts, why do you ignore them? Seems really strange to me.
i've acknowledged it several times when debating C.J. i've never denied it once. let's see if you live by the same rules. who won the fight between floyd and pacman?
I thought Pac edged it. Neither man did much, but Pac authored the 2 most significant sequences of the fight and he was tit for tat w/ punches landed. Just because Pac's punch output was below EXPECTATIONS doesn't mean it should affect the scoring, which it did.
Floyd, but so did Horn and Bradley. I don't consider those losses. Romero won (officially) a UD against Marinez. Do you think Romero actually has a win over Marinez?
Yada, yada, yada. Both sides were full of ****. Excuses after excuses. And I already stated in a previous post that I thought Floyd was likely on PED´s.
thankyou for saying floyd, C.J. could never do that. but you're also doing what C.J. does : downplaying losses to your favourite fighter, or 'overturning' results.
as an aussie, i don't hold the horn win in any great standing, except that he can say he beat the great manny pacquiao. same with danny green over roy jones.