I agree this thread is about BJS who has ducked or pulled out of matches with Andrade on 2 occasions AND blatantly said how he would not fight GGG. Stating how GGG would beat him and another boxer on the same night. Who admits that PUBLICLY!! Then after GGG gets older and shows vulnerability he magically wants to fight him all of a sudden. The Charlos having been chasing Canelo since 154. Jermall has also called out GGG, who wanted no parts of him.
Saunders is a bit of a strange case I remember he couldn't lose weight for the Lee fight,which was also Andy's long awaited "homecoming" bout in Limerick, Ireland, so he withdrew and went to fat camp before winning the rescheduled fight quite some time later He also habitually has fought to the level of his opponents; which has made for truly stinkworthy performances, and, I would say, he's not terribly motivated generally speaking; not bothered about making the most money, being the fittest, leading the best career; because he's quite comfortable and has the confidence that he can, on his day, beat anybody and he doesn't care what the fans or the media have to say about it, because he's a traveling man My money is on Saunders this fight
Wow Saunders sounds like a total bum then. He should fit right in with Canelo's typical opponents and I expect him to knock this gypsy fraud out no later than the fifth, yeah? If Canelo doesn't run through him like a bad batch of beans, I guess ginger will have exposed his true level. Expecting total domination by Clenelo come fight night.
STFU you POS. You cry like a ***** about me hating fighters I don't even dislike! Go back to your hole bitchass troll...
We??? Who the hell do you think you speak for *******? All the stupid 12yo trolls that are as braindead as you? Just ****off.... you bring nothing to the table.
then youre answering with immaterial facts. just pulling crap out the air. i just wanted to confirm thats what i read.
So clearly you don't understand the point of my post. It had nothing to do with the Charlo and everything to do with the failed logic of the one I replied to.