Thomas Hearns boxing style

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Notepad12, May 23, 2021.

  1. reckless

    reckless Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2018
    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    1,251
    A bit of a weight fraud. Someone his height should have been fighting at light heavyweight at least.
     
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2017
    Messages:
    36,653
    Likes Received:
    16,582
    Usyk would have destroyed Canelo at cruiser.
     
  3. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2017
    Messages:
    36,653
    Likes Received:
    16,582
    He was a lot slower at light heavy, and know 6`1 fighter could have fought as well as Hearns did at welter nor could they have out-boxed Benitez at 154, I know Breland couldn`t have done that and no way would Hearns have lost to Starling.
     
  4. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2017
    Messages:
    36,653
    Likes Received:
    16,582
    Will do.
     
  5. Jamal Perkins

    Jamal Perkins Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,770
    Likes Received:
    3,220
    Youre right he should've been dancing to knockout face first in chilling fashion a ATG who was never knocked out in 90 odd fights.

    I really think there's a stain on Tommy's record because he had to go flat footed to knockout Duran.
     
  6. reckless

    reckless Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2018
    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    1,251
    Yes I know that but that was not his natural weight. Being 147lb at 6'1 is borderline anorexic.

    Most athletes his height in an explosive sport would be light heavyweights at the very least, most likely cruiserweight.

    He used his height advantages against much shorter men who actually belonged in those weight classes.