Floyd Mayweather: When Canelo fought me, he was in his prime, I was an old man. I wasn't in my prime

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by xnico, Jun 8, 2021.


  1. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,899
    Apr 14, 2009
    That Sir is yet another lie to come from this debacle Tony NEVER was indicted of anything, NEVER went to court, The CSAC witnesses & Nazim Richardson blatantly lied which was proven by the independant lab tests on thePads Where were the "PLASTER BLOCKS" Naz claimed he saw ?? What happened to the supposed "White plaster like substance" they claimed was smeared on the pads?? Why wasnt the CSAC insp who sat & watched Tony's hands wrapped, passed them & signed off on them BEFORE!! Naz started his usual BS ever interviewed or questioned??
    What happened to the US law " A man is deemed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law " there never was any court of law, never was any proof of misconduct by Tony whatsoever. That was a classic Kangaroo court . Which is This mans guilty because we say he is & we are the State Commission & we rule the sport This is precisely why Tony was never indicted it would have been laughed out of any court for lack of evidence
     
    Ph33rknot likes this.
  2. rhin0z>

    rhin0z> Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,405
    1,089
    Jul 13, 2014
    Sir, you cannot make up your own facts. nor rewrite history. This whole case is well documented all over the internet. a simple google search will reveal all the facts.
     
    Pimp C likes this.
  3. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,899
    Apr 14, 2009
    A simple Google search will reveal only what the CSAC version publicised
    Look up the case when Tony applied for his licence to be returned to him. Read that & not the CSAC version. Read how the witnesses differed & argued What this boils down to is The CSAC revoked Antonio Margaritos licence to box in CALIFORNIA only because they " SUSPECTED he may have tried to load his gloves BUT provided absolutely no evidence whatsoever to prove that fact
    Its been done an innocent mans good name & career were tarnished unjustly I hope & pray Karma rears its head to give all concerned their just rewards
     
  4. Ph33rknot

    Ph33rknot Live as if you were to die tomorrow Full Member

    22,941
    22,865
    Mar 5, 2012
    Pics of the bricks
     
    C.J. likes this.
  5. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,177
    35,349
    Jun 23, 2005
    :risas3::risas3::risas3:
     
  6. The Real Lance

    The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,138
    10,596
    Oct 29, 2012
    You brought up all these other fighters who have NOTHING to do with Canelo at age 22-23. You're too stupid to even understand that. Simple rube...
     
  7. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,177
    35,349
    Jun 23, 2005
    It's called making a comparison you stupid Alaskan cannery worker. It's similar enough. Lopez was the younger guy like Canelo was fighting the older guy. Loma was P4P #1 or #2 on all the lists when he lost and was prime or closer to his prime than PBF when he fought Canelo at 36. No one called Lopez green and not prime when the fight was made and he was younger and had fewer fights than Canelo did when he fought PBF. The fact remains Canelo at 23 was closer to his prime than PBF was at 36. It's not my fault you're a miserable dumb SOB and can't understand this basic comparison. Get the **** outta that frozen wasteland and maybe you will learn a thing or two.
     
  8. The Real Lance

    The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,138
    10,596
    Oct 29, 2012
    Comparison to what moron? I just stated Canelo, at 22-23, was NOT in his physical prime. Are you arguing that? I didn't need a comparison because I wasn't even trying to look at comparisons...because I was just talking about Canelo's prime. illiterate punkass...

    And see....ALL you can do, even in this so called rebuttal, is talk about Floyd when I am talking about Canelo's prime. Are you dense???

    Either learn how to read English properly, learn proper context of subjects, or just go eff yourself third grade reading level loser.
     
  9. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,177
    35,349
    Jun 23, 2005
    You need to learn how to read and understand basic comparisons. Anyone with a 4th grade education or higher can clearly see what I'm saying here. You're being dismissive because you have no counter for my argument. You're a broke hating dumbass. I made several comparisons from RJJ to Bolt to Phelps and even Lopez yet you sit there and want to act dumb like you can't understand what I'm talking about as if they makes what I'm saying any less valuable. Play dumb with someone else. Canelo was closer to his prime than PBF was when they fought period, refute that or log off.
     
  10. The Real Lance

    The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,138
    10,596
    Oct 29, 2012
    What you posted meant jack **** to me Pimp. Like I said, i was strictly talking about Canelo's prime. So your 'comparison' had nothing to do with anything I posted. Why is that hard for you to freakin understand? Do you have a damn reading disability or something?

    I'm dismissing your posts because they have no revelenace to MY POST, that you quoted. Want to talk about Canelo's prime, since that was what I was talking about? Then talk about CANELO'S PRIME. Not some damn runner or Floyd or RJJ or Rhelps or even loopez. Why? Because NONE ARE CANELO IDIOT. You're just so dumb you think just saying "What about.....RJJ, Phelps, Bolt...." means something.

    Go back to grade school..get your GED or something.
     
  11. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,177
    35,349
    Jun 23, 2005
    Just as I thought you have no rebuttal and are full of hate and **** as usual. I made a valid point quit being such a jackass and learn to read. Canelo was closer to his prime than PBF was when they fought. You're being willfully ignorant.
     
  12. The Real Lance

    The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,138
    10,596
    Oct 29, 2012
    Full of hate? :lol: grow up you old punk.

    Look dude.... You decided all your nonsense about Phelps, RJJ, Bolt and Lopez had some relevance to Canelo's prime. NONE of those mean anything in regards to Canelo. Seriously man, stop being such a stubborn twat just because you brought up stuff had nothing to do with my post.

    You're point you think you made had NOTHING SPECIFICALLY to do with canelo's prime. Just whataboutism from an idiot....
    WHen do you think Canelo was in his physical prime? What ages?
     
  13. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,147
    24,176
    Feb 19, 2007
    i agree with that. its better to be 23 than 36 physically. everything responds faster. and neither 23 nor 36 are an ideal age for physical primes. at 23 you dont yet know what your body is capable of. you have the energy and recovery, but you dont know how to administer them correctly. you dont know yourself or the situation well enough yet. at 36, with floyds knowledge and experience, he had every second of every rd already preplanned. so in that particular situation, floyd vs canelo, floyd definitely had the advantage. not a big advantage, but enough to make a difference.
     
    The Real Lance likes this.
  14. The Real Lance

    The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,138
    10,596
    Oct 29, 2012
    Thanks Badeedo...hopefully this makes a dent in that skull of his..
     
    bandeedo likes this.
  15. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,686
    Sep 8, 2010
    If you believe all of what Floyd has said, boy, what a special little world you live in. What is he supposed to say? "Dude I suck now. My back hurts when I wake up. My neck is stiff half the mornings. My wrist is sore."
     
    kirk likes this.