This content is protected : "Is there a story about Sam Langford films being discovered? Like when it took place and how it surfaced?" This content is protected "I discovered the most recent batch which was nearly 20 years ago. Myself and four other people paid to have them transferred and preserved and agreed to keep them to ourselves as the cost was extremely high and if one of us let it out the others might get angry as their investment was sunk. We also didnt want to get into legal hot water as we didnt own the actual films and only agreed to pay the cost to get personal copies. One of the members showed it to a friend who eventually acquired a low quality copy and claimed that he discovered it. Thats one of the reasons I dont deal with anyone anymore" This content is protected
Seriously, though, collectors are allowed to collect what they like and what they do with their individual collections is their business. Nothing wrong with that. Kind of "dickish" though to announce you have something (of anything) that you know others want and then tell everyone they can't have it. If you have no intention of sharing something (regardless of what it is) with anyone, keep it to yourself. Leads to fewer problems.
I don't understand why someone would not want to share it ?! Hell, if you want to make money of it, he can simply setup some sort of pay per view event or something along those lines
As a full-time collector of basketball footage, I hate klompton approach. I'm well aware of how expensive it is to transfer film tapes, but to do that and then talk that you will never share it? That's ridiculous. I already paid thousands of dolars for 1960s and 1970s NBA footage and you can see samples on YT. You can also contact me and I never made problems for people who wants to see my footage. Seriously, klompton has all the rights to keep it for himself, but what's the reason...?
I disagree. I don't want them to give me the reels, I just want them to post them on youtube, they can leep their original footage.
And if they paid a lot of money to buy or restore the footage, there are countlesss boxing enthusiasts like us who are more than happy to chip in some cash
First you have to believe Clompton has it. As an inveterate liar he is very unbelievable. If Jacobs didn't have it, I doubt this dude does.
Steve has the footage he talks about. He's posted screenshots of fights he's purchased. I'm happy someone/anyone is preserving them. I messaged him here about a collection he wanted to purchase from someone, because he was looking for people to go in on it, but I just wasn't interested in the fights he was purchasing when I saw the list of what the person was selling. He is on the level. Lots of people have bigger fight collections than Jim Jacobs had and still find films all the time. I just don't agree about throwing it in peoples' faces. If he says he has footage of Langford, he does. And now you know where it is.
Why don't those people want to share those fights ?! I just don't get it. At least post a small clip from those fights on youtube, 30 seconds long
Some billionaires give all their money away, most don't. Maybe he'll donate his collection to a museum or college one day. And you can go and watch all the films you like. It's his hobby. It's his collection. He can do what he wants with it. Some people collect priceless art and just keep it in a house where no one can see it. Some don't. People are people.
I have no idea who some of these collectors are, but believe me if I knew, I'd go and beat the living daylight out of them. If they are so afraid of someone else taking credit for the footage they own, just make some big press conference where they can announce themselves as the ones who found/own it.
I am certainly not a soulmate of Klompton/Compton, but why on earht should he just give away fights to Youtube that he has paid a lot of money to get??