You talk about the facts but do you even know the facts. Fact is Whyte served a 2 year ban for his first failed test. Canelo served 6 months for a fighter who fights twice per year it basically wasn't even a ban. You wan't to talk about double standards that's one right there. UK you get banned for 2 years or suspended for 2 years as in the case with Fury. In the US slap on the wrist. Fact yes Whyte on 20th June 2020 had an adverse test result with 2 trace amount of steroid metabolites found in his sample. Fact B sample wasn't tested, but why wasn't it tested some my ask, well because it really wasn't needed to be tested because of the following. Fact UKAD cleared him because a sample 3 days before was clean and other tests done at the time were clean including tests sent to VADA labs between the 20th June and 20th of July. So 20th June UKAD find an adverse result but VADA say he was clean and all other tests around that time were clean, what does that suggest? Contamination in the adverse UKAD test obviously if another lab at the same time found he was clean and all the other tests at the time were clean. If he had really been doping surely VADA the supposed gold standard to some would of picked up on his doping not just UKAD and surely one of the other tests would have come up adversely. Now maybe Whyte did dope again but fact is there simply wasn't the evidence to charge him on it as there was so much evidence to suggest what we had was simply a case of cross contamination in a lab which does happen all the time which is why B samples are even a thing because fact is you can't trust just one adverse result.
What? More than once, what's more than once? Not sure what you are implying or saying. I know English isn't you're first language but to repeat what Caligua4 said earlier, WTF are you trying to say? This content is protected
You could take that logic a long way... For example: Whyte has a resume, Ortiz does not. Whyte has a resume, Wilder does not. To be clear, Whyte would beat Martin all over the ring because he's a serious fighter and Martin isn't - resumes bear that out, yes, but resumes alone aren't necessarily always enough... For example, Whytes resume is far better than Wilders but it'd probably be a 50/50 fight.
I've never rated Martin but I'd also say he can't be taken too lightly. God works in mysterious ways.
Whyte by KO is the most likely outcome because Martin is so mediocre but any heavyweight who can punch even a bit can KO Whyte. Martin completely froze against AJ, he isn't usually that bad.
He is that bad, he couldn't even beat Kownacki who's defence is basically getting hit in the face repeatedly and hoping he KO's his opponent before he is KO'ed. Martin's power looks OK if you don't look too deeply at his record. His best KO maybe Washington who has been stopped by everyone who has beaten him and if you look at the guys he's KO'ed they all have really bad chins. Martz 8 KO losses out of 9, Corbin 3 KO losses out of 4, Marrone 11 KO losses out of 12, Polley 21 KO losses out of 24, Sandez 7 KO losses out of 9, Dallas 9 KO losses out of 10 etc. You see a trend there right a bunch of KO wins against guys who are pretty much guaranteed to get stopped. Stick him in the ring with a guy with a half decent chin like Kownacki and he goes the distance. Now Whyte does have a bad chin but Povetkin and Joshua's power is on another stratosphere to Martin's. Whyte has taken hard shots from Rivas and Parker and gotten back up. I think Whyte could handle Martins single shot power. Martin will need more than one good punch.
Easy fight? Piece of cake? Alright, now I can't wait to see how eager to be let off the leash and dole out retribution The Villain is once in the ring with Mr. Walks This Earth Like A God.
I'd love to see Martin get in the ring with Arslanbek Makhmudov , there he could be properly executed.