Bob Satterfield vs Bob Foster LH Who Wins ?

I think at 175 Foster should be heavily favored and likely would win. But powerful shot to the chin from Satterfield could be dangerous for anyone

 

Satterfield for my money.

 

Satterfield via brutal KO.

 

Satterfield just as dangerous as Foster up close. Foster lands first I think. I think Satterfield wants a punchup but Foster's KO's were almost always close counters.

Foster always had major problems fighting bigger guys... I dont think Satterfield is so much bigger to cause problems, considering Foster was never really at risk during his LHW reign. He had to fight HW but he failed every time against good HW..

Satterfield catches a left hook he doesnt see coming and that'll be that.

 

Foster ko's him, Satterfield wasn't big enough to take Foster

 

Satterfield was levels below Foster. At light-heavyweight, he literally isn't better in any aspect. Foster does to him what Moore and Charles did, and also what Johnson, Hall and Henry did.

Early KO for Foster.

 

Foster all the way for mine.

 

Ehh Satterfield tended to fight to his competition. His wins are far superior to Foster…like blows him away oddly. But he also could lose to someone a lot less then Foster. He was wildly inconsistent prob due to his partying

 

Foster Ko 4.

 

Absolutely not.

If he fought to his competition, he'd have seen past the third round vs Moore or Charles.

He might have better wins than Foster, but that's because there wasn't any one around for Foster to beat. Foster decimated his division and left it a wasteland.

He fought in a much deeper era than Foster, but he wasn't close to being better. Actually, he isn't better at anything. He's so far out of his depth that it's unreal.

Foster ends him and he does it early.

 

Fosters wins are terrible when compared to Satterfields. That’s not a comparison you want to make. Foster also came up in a much weaker LHW division then Satterfield did and Foster did zip at HW as compared to Satterfield.

wrote this and next post before I fully read your paragraph. He had plenty of people to beat he just failed against the better contender unlike Satterfield.

 

Satterfield has wins over
Valdez
Cleveland Williams
Baker
Oma
Holman
Summerlin
Harold Johnson
Oakland Billy smith

Foster doesn’t really compare in the quality wins department. And he also gave guys like Charles and Layne hell for the time he was in the ring

 

Satterfield lasted less than 2 rounds against way past his best Charles. "For the time he was in the ring" is funny when you realize that he was in the ring for less than 6 minutes.

 

He was also stopped in two rounds by Harold Johnson at 175 who was a great fighter but not the puncher Foster was. Most of bob’s stoppage losses either came when out of prime or against full fledged heavies