Losing some respect for Golovkin

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by split_decision, Jul 20, 2021.


  1. Bumnard_Hopkins

    Bumnard_Hopkins Burger King banned Full Member

    908
    680
    Jul 13, 2021
    You should read comments carefully, imbecile.

    Moneywise Eubank Jr > Ward. Even if Ward had returned at 168 he still wouldn't have been a major attraction.
     
  2. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    35,872
    23,745
    Feb 19, 2007
    i didnt say i expected anything. read what i said, is any of it incorrect? the feelings my words caused in you, are something apart from what i said. did i say anything untrue? i dont care how it made you feel, i want to know if its untrue? if it is, what part?
     
  3. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,540
    9,548
    Aug 1, 2012
    Vs Mayweather rounds 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 12 could all theoretically be scored to Canelo. Those were close rounds. That doesn't mean that I was arguing that I thought he won the fight which is what you said. Even if you give all those rounds to Canelo which I didn't, it's still only a draw. You said I was arguing that Canelo "beat Floyd" :
    Never did I tried to argue for a "card" saying Canelo beat Floyd.
     
  4. Bumnard_Hopkins

    Bumnard_Hopkins Burger King banned Full Member

    908
    680
    Jul 13, 2021
    Are you on drugs? Your comment makes no sense.
    :qmeparto:

    Mayweather beat Canelo 12-0 or 11-1.
     
    gollumsluvslave likes this.
  5. The Real Lance

    The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,946
    10,213
    Oct 29, 2012
    They didn't cause any feeling Bandeedo. Why would you even ask such a question, other than that's what you HOPE occurs. Seriously...just cut that crap out dude.

    Untrue!?!?! Why would you ask THAT? Did I say anything you said was untrue? There was nothing to be untrue to begin with FFS. Get a grip man.

    Do you even understand what I was asking? Because your reply suggests you really have no idea.

    So you lost respect for 3G because he didn't fight "Mexican style"...what I was asking, read that again...ASKING...was do you hold that for other boxers? Guy says he'll win via KO, and instead wins UD. Just like w/ 3G, you'd lose respect for them too?

    That's honestly just a silly tactic.

    "He didn't fight how he said he was gonna...I'm no longer a fan". That's what your post comes down to.
     
  6. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,540
    9,548
    Aug 1, 2012
    FYI scores were 116-112, 117-111, 114-114. Far from 12-0 or 11-1. That's fanboy scoring
     
  7. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    35,872
    23,745
    Feb 19, 2007
    sometimes. i dont expect what i say to make sense to everyone. not everyone is equally bright. but make no mistake, the intelligent people here, have no problem understanding how intelligent i am. thats just reality, no delusion or boast.
     
  8. Surrix

    Surrix Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,822
    2,116
    Sep 16, 2020
    No one takes risks worth nothing.
    You think Canelo ever had took risks worth nothing? All his career is properly and carefully developed.
    Best example how good was Canelo matchmaking was fight vs Mosley. Mosley then was 38, coming out of 2 lost fights and 1 draw in his last 3 fights. Damn, appeared boxer with 0-2-1 record in last 3 fights was enough good for a title fight.
    Next beauty: blown up welterweight in Khan for middleweight title fight : again was enough good for a title fight.
    Canelo catchweights, short camps for opponents, clauses, moving up and down in weight classes to pick fights.
     
  9. The Real Lance

    The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,946
    10,213
    Oct 29, 2012
    EDIT: My bad... I thought I was replying to scar. Ignore the rest. Again, sorry.

    Imbecile?? Look at what you quoted dumbass. You quoted me saying Ward came back as a Lt HW. Well...did he or did he not, return from huis layoff as a LtHW?

    And no **** Eubanks jr was a bigger draw. Did I deny that? I said Eubanks Jr pulled out,. and hence we got 3G v Brooks. The heck are you on about here anyway?
     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2021
  10. The Real Lance

    The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,946
    10,213
    Oct 29, 2012
    You made no sense Badeedo. I asked you a question...and you replied w/ a drunken uncle garble about truths or whatever.
     
  11. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    35,872
    23,745
    Feb 19, 2007
    right in the post you quoted.
     
  12. The Real Lance

    The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,946
    10,213
    Oct 29, 2012
    :lol: That's convenient. Just use this whenever you make an ass outta yourself and don't have the balls to just admit your simple little mistake.

    What's important is you try your hardest to look good to nameless, faceless posters...
     
  13. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    35,872
    23,745
    Feb 19, 2007
    and yet, after several straight forward questions about it, you have yet to point out that mistake. so let me repeat it again.
    i dont expect what i say to make sense to everyone. not everyone is equally bright.
     
  14. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,540
    9,548
    Aug 1, 2012
    You say untrue stuff all the time. You just did it with me saying I "argued" for a card that Canelo beat Mayweather whatever that means lol. You make up stuff, then get called out for lying, then act like what you said was true.
    Now you're trying to conflate GGG accusing Canelo of not fighting Mexican Style to fighters saying they'll win by KO. Two completely different things clown. One is a style/strategy the other is desired result.
    It wasn't just GGG saying how HE was gonna fight, it was GGG claiming that Canelo didn't fight "Mexican Style" and making that a central theme of the rematch. GGG paraded around like he was the warrior of the two, that he was the more fan friendly fighter, who fights in a come forward aggressive toe-to-toe style, but then when push came to shove, he ended up NOT fighting like that. So how he fought proves that all GGG's rhetoric about how Canelo didn't fight Mexican Style was all just a way to get Canelo to fight him the way he wanted him to fight, because he couldn't deal with how Canelo fought him the first time.

    And Canelo had no problem fighting GGG the way he wanted him to fight, Mexican Style. And he BEAT GGG that way lol. So Canelo not only fought GGG the way GGG wanted him to, but he literally beat him at his own game! That makes Canelo's win more significant in that not only did he win, but that he won fighting the way that GGG ask him to fight. It turned out that GGG wanted no part of a Mexican Style war with Canelo. When Canelo brought it Mexican Style, GGG curled up and fought the way that he criticized Canelo for fighting the first time.
     
  15. UniversalPart

    UniversalPart Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,495
    11,623
    Jul 1, 2010
    Possibly, but least he put the effort in to look good, stay in shape and always put on a show for the paying fans and go for a KO. He also underlined his elite credentials against Canelo too in two very close fights that he arguably won.

    That's what helped cement his position into a boxing star.

    Now though? I question his desire and I think Canelo will probably stop him unless Golovkin can turn back the clock and just throw bombs and stop Canelo.