I assume GGG is not fighting this year. Murata needs a tune up before since he's already been inactive for 19 months and GGG only fought once in the last what, 2 years?
GGG is done I'm afraid. Finished. At his age, if you have been inactive leading up to this point you are pretty much done. His style is no good for somebody in their 40's, no good. Just taking blows to the head, no defense. Canelo took his soul. Just shows how good BHOP was tbh, active and disciplined he was like a young fighter when he was 40. Plus his style, immaculate defense.
Reality is, it’s just me an you snowflake, stop making out there’s more than you. Another weakness I’ve just clocked with you, deludedly adding more to this war Bandeedos . Just me and you brains
Show me where there has been any tests GGG has failed?? There are none Show me where GGG has moved up & down weights at times looking like a mini incredible hulk ?? Never!! Show me where GGG has had any very very suspect decisions in his favor ?? Never !! Yet Canelo is a proven & punished (rofl) Ped's abuser when he popped dirty for Clenbuterol etc Plus the other two instances above.
Have you ever seen any fighter who got a decision in his favor ever come out & say " I didnt deserve that decision, I got beat"?? LOL No But simply by his actions you can tell. He knows the majority the fans do not believe he ever beat GGG LEGITIMATELY!! & it must be on his concience
He's a top level athlete. Read the literature concerning anti-doping policy and anti-doping governance. If you want to live in cuckoo land forever, that's up to you.
Again, you are assuming he is thinking a certain way because that's what you want him to think. He hasn't come out and said anything, and according to you he wouldn't anyway. I think you misunderstand his mentality. He believes he got the better of GGG and, based on the scoring, he was correct. Now, we know he was gifted a draw in the first fight and the second was very close too - and I've already said I think GGG won the first fight and the second was a draw. You need to stop putting words in his mouth, stop assuming that because your perspective seems valid to you it means it does to him. Find the quotes attributed to him regarding GGG and their fights. They are the only relevant insights.
Theoretically, but not actually. And not in the way that CJ Ross got there. Some of the rounds she gave to Canelo I did not agree with, I thought they were Mayweather rounds. But some of the rounds she gave to Mayweather I thought were Canelo rounds. Comprende? So I disagreed with her scoring of some of the rounds, but the total score of a draw wasn't out of the realm of possibility, as there are about 6 rounds that you could reasonably give to Canelo. But to give the same fighter so many of the close rounds doesn't seem fair. I usually try to split rounds that are close or score some rounds even.
What happened with golovkin is that he lost passion for boxing after realizing that a brand matters more than a performance in the ring and the business screwed him over in both fights with el cinnamino. Same thing with kovalev and ward, if he got the win in their first fight like he he earned his career and life would have went a different path. These clowns in boxing screw over the fighters lives like its nothing to them.
Well I just wanted to break it down for you so you get it fully. I think sometimes you try to portray delusionality on to me by buying into myths or pretending like I argued something which I didn't. You have sort of like a rivalry with me as far as Canelo and GGG goes, so in an effort to enhance your position, you have an incentive to try to poke holes in my arguments. But I'm impenetrable when it comes to my scoring of matches and my overall boxing knowledge. You know that by now. You can hit me with the kitchen sink and I'll counter it effectively with sound reasoning and logic. I don't think you should fight it anymore. It is delusional to say that GGG beat Canelo when we both know that didn't happen. So for you to turn it around on me and say I'm delusional, well that's just delusional. It's your delusions which have caused you to conclude that I'm delusional. It's like kiwi and his argument that I'm being controversial for not saying something's controvrersial. These double negatives cancel each other out and what you're left with is you being delusional and controversial and me not.
