I am pretty sure EJ is going to catch the Senator from General Santos City in the Paragani Province from the Philippines. Thanks Manny Pacquiao it’s been a great career but all good things must come to an end. I hope you become President in the future. Jinkee will make a great First Lady.
Nah.......Duterte will beat Pacquaio in the next presidential election in Philippines. Pacquiao doesn't have enough experience in Politics as good as he has in boxing.
$500 is my limit on this. If not for the 2 years of inactivity, I'd do the $2,000. Terms of the bet: If Spence knocks Pac out, you get $500. If Spence doesn't knock Pac out, I get $500. If Spence wins by decision, I get $500. If the fight is a draw, I get $500. If Pac quits on his stool from punishment, you get $500. If Pac quits on his stool due to a cut that can't be controlled and is not from a punch, I get $500. This may need further refining for clarity. So call this TBD for the moment. Can't be a premature or BS stoppage. Forum can decide this through a vote. In this case, we both get our money back. If the fight is stopped on a cut not stemming from a punch, we both get our money back minus the processing fee which will be discussed next. A mutually-agreed upon member who is willing to act as the escrow will hold the money. For his participation, he will receive $100. So $550 will be the amount both of us will send to this person. I'm also preparing for a meeting, so will need to review the proposed terms for accuracy and wording so it's a fair and precisely defined bet, but it's a very solid starting first draft.
Pac is 42 and been out for 2 years. I'm not a blind nut hugger like you — like you ball licking proven drug cheat, catchweight king, rehydration king, and short camp king Clenelo.
If you don’t have the balls to bet $2,000 then don’t come trying to bet me son or lay down terms to me. I see from the crap you posted you are wasting my time so I will let you off this time because your mouth is writing cheques your bank balance can’t count.
Has nothing to do w/ balls, but rather intelligence. I didn't achieve my wealth and financial security at my age because I made dumb financial moves. THAT SAID... You're a ho ass coward if you don't take the original $500. There is no reason not to. And I seriously doubt you have the funds or disposable income to gamble $2,000. And I'm not calling your bluff on it because like I said, I'm only willing to bet $500, so it would be pointless. Take the $500 bet, ******.
That is not the question though. The question is about how the judges would see it, and it's utterly ridiculous to remotely think that Pac has the upper hand when (if it ever does) it gets to the scorecards. Utterly and completely ridiculous, that anybody who thinks Pac -- the most robbed famous boxer in the past decade and cashing his way out of the sport -- will be given the nod if it's close, should never be respected in these boards ever again. I think Pac has to dominate Spence in the same fashion FMJ dominated him, so that's 9-3 to 8-4.
What stipulations? Anyone who is serious about betting actual money will want clearly defined terms of the agreement. Common sense. If he wants to paint a very precise scenario where there's no gray area whatsoever, I'll consider the bet. But he slinked away because he was never serious.