You also have to realise that mab is not Ray Leonard or even close Pacquiao is a great fighter no doubt, but Duran is greater
What he did will likely never be replicated. He was insane, a generational talent. Shame so many so-called 'boxing fans' hate him simply because of nationality or skin color. Picking sides has always been so stupid...
Before people start in on the OP for pointing out the primitive style of the old timers. I would ask that you watch footage of George Dixon. Nat Fliesher called Dixon the greatest bantam weight of all time. I think if Dixon fought today, he wouldn't be fighting very long. He would get brutalized. Very ametuerish style. All wrong to compete with today's fighters.
I think ATG list should be broken up in 20 year increments. Or at least a pre and post 1950 list should be made.
This content is protected Notable opponents beaten: Harry Greb - Tunney, Walker, Loughran, Gibbons, Norfolk, Slattery, Smith, Levinsky, Miske, Flowers, Rosenbloom Sugar Ray Robinson - Angott, Zivic, Armstrong, LaMotta, Gavilan, Villemain, Fullmer, Basilio, Graziano, Olson Henry Armstrong - Arizmendi, Ross, Ambers, Garcia, Angott, Wolgast, Jenkins, Zivic Ezzard Charles - Louis, Walcott, Moore, Bivins, Burley, Maxim, Yarosz, Overlin, Marshall, Christoforidis, Lesnevich Roberto Duran - Leonard, DeJesus, Buchanan, Barkley, Cuevas, Palomino, Ishimatsu, Mamby, Viruet, Marcel, Kobayashi Archie Moore - Bivins, Chase, Williams, Johnson, Satterfield, Maxim, Olson, Cocoa Kid, Marshall Ray Leonard - Hagler, Hearns, Duran, Benitez, Kalule, Mayweather, Lalonde Tony Canzoneri - McLarnin, Ambers, Dundee, Singer, Berg, Chocolate, Arizmendi Jimmy McLarnin - Mandell, Singer, Corbett III, Ross, Canzoneri, Ambers, Leonard, Petrolle, Villa, La Barba Holman Williams - Cocoa Kid, Booker, Burley, Marshall, Chase, Moore, Satterfield Gene Tunney - Dempsey, Greb, Carpentier, Gibbons, Levinsky Manny Pacquiao- Marquez, Morales, Barrera, De La Hoya, Cotto, Bradley, Margarito, Mosley, Hatton, Ledwaba, Thurman Floyd Mayweather Jr.- Pacquiao, De La Hoya, Alvarez, Castillo, Corrales, Mosley, Cotto, Hernandez, Marquez Emile Griffith - Ortega, Fernandez, Rodriguez, Paret, Fullmer, Tiger, Archer, Benvenuti, Briscoe Tommy Loughran - Walker, Greb, Baer, Braddock, Carpentier, Stribling, McTigue, Slattery, Schaaf, Uzcudun, Levinsky, Sharkey Jimmy Bivins - Christoforidis, Yarosz, Bettina, Soose, Lesnevich, Maxim, Savold, Charles, Marshall, Moore Lou Ambers - Canzoneri, Armstrong, Jenkins, Cocoa Kid, Villa, Zivic, Arizmendi Most top ten rated opponents beaten: 1. Ray Robinson 45 2. Archie Moore 43 3. Ezzard Charles 40 4. Emile Griffith 36 5. Manuel Ortiz 34 6. Henry Armstrong 33 6. Muhammad Ali 33 8. Ike Williams 31 8. Joe Louis 31 10. Manny Pacquiao 28 11. Willie Pep 27 11. Bernard Hopkins 27 Floyd Mayweather 25
I already addressed this in the Op. For one, boxers record is incomplete. Second, in countries like Thailand, PH, Mexico where tons of bouts happen, many of them won’t be recorded. Most of the old bouts were on US soil which has better bookkeeping. Third, there were more pros back then but far more amateurs today due to the emphasis on amateur boxing. Basically, only the top ams usually go pro. I boxed for a long time and I’d imagine that if I were in the 20s, I’d be a pro to make a living out of it. However, I didn’t fancy getting paid nothing and getting beat up for it, I also knew I wasn’t anywhere on that level so why bother when I earn money in other ways. So it’s not as simple as a box Rex count. you would have to be crazy to think there were more boxers 100 years ago than today, given the globalised sport and increased population.
Boxing used to be a much more popular sport. More people boxed in the past. The sport's popularity declined significantly, and it's only because the population of the world has significantly increased that we currently see similar levels of boxing participation today.
Benny Leonard looks like a modern fighter in 1922. This content is protected Also, Barney Ross doesn't look primitive in 1935. He's got a different stance and guard, not doing ear muffs, but you'll see his technique incorporates a lot more crouching and bending. This content is protected Those other two clips show expert pound for pound boxers against other elite fighters, but I think to really appreciate how skilled but different the technique back then was you ought to see someone like Tommy Loughran, an adept outside boxer schooling James Braddock an unskilled slugger. Watch how easily he toys with Braddock using the high technique of the day. This content is protected
He claimed the BW/FW championship in the 1890s. 1906 is way past his best. George Dixon is considered the pioneer of the "Slick Black" style. He'd do just fine against people of his weight today.
That's simply not true and no data to back that up. Professional boxing may have been more popular in the US in the 20s but not worldwide, certainly not when you account for Russia, Cuba, Thailand, Mexico, PH etc. It also doesn’t account for amateur boxing. It’s a different model today, you only turn pro if you have potential, usually.
What are you watching. He has his hands on his stomach, his chin sticks out, he charges in a straight line with his chin up. The fact that he looks somewhat modern and absolutely dominated that era speaks further proof as to how low quality boxing was back then.