Duran isn't a top 10 ATG without his win over SRL???? We could do that for every fighter and play a game of what ifs the fact is he beat SRL and is a top 10 ATG. Pac doesn't have any wins over a top 10 ATG like SRL does he doesn't even have a win over a top 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 I could go on and on. I told you I value quality over quantity. I couldn't care less if Pac went through weight classes if he didn't beat elite ATG fighters while doing so. What Pac did was great but you're saying he's greater than SRL and Duran so he will be put on there level of wins and he doesn't stack up with them because both have wins over elite ATGS. If you were saying Pac is greater than Lennox Lewis then I wouldn't have an argument for it and would agree but you're trying to say he's better than 2 elite level ATGS and that's simply not the case.
You're tying too hard to focus on a single win as the basis and justification for rankings. That's not how it goes.
I'm a little worried about all these gay-themed posts you are making. Please leave me out of your erotic fantasies, thanks.
That post of his was regarding having a better single win to determine ATG rankings Follow the post chain...not hard to understand.
Try follow the conversation at least. Also, there's something burning on the grill behind ya. Pour some beer on it fast before your mom clouts your ear
Actually its damn easy because Leonards win over Hagler beats any 1 win that Pac has. No need to bring up Buster beating Tyson, because that has no relevence since buster didnt do **** after. Only way Pac can have an argument is if he beat Spence and Crawford.
It's exactly how it goes. Quality of wins matters. If your best win is MAB and another fighter has beaten Duran hearns hagler and benitez and you have worse losses then you're not greater.
