Is this proof Deontay Wilder should have won the first fight?

Delete thread

 

Oh wow. Another "slow count" claim from some clown who doesn't know what they're talking about.

 

Alejandro Rochin is the only dodgyness in that fight

Clearly payed off judge

 

...........................

Fury was clearly able to continue fighting, and the count starts when the ref begins counting from 1-10.

 

It’s a 10 count, not a 10-second count.

 

This content is protected

He got up right at 10. Could it be counted as a KO? YEA it could be, but it wasnt.

 

I never thought the LDBC would surpass the Canelo super fans as the most despicable fans in boxing.
We just need Wilder to fail a drug test like his brother and use the tainted beef theory.

 

Provided that happened he likely would have fought Fury again if Fury wanted a rematch because Wilder would be confident that he'd beat Fury again like he was in real life and then that can goes 2 or 3 ways. maybe Fury sticks with his gameplan to outbox and beats Wilder that way or gets KO'd again, or he trains under Javon and beats Wilder that way in this scenario like he did in real life.

 

Urgh, that video is painful. You'd think he'd at least have a glance at the rules.

The only fighter robbed in that ring was Fury. The two knock downs of course warranted a rematch, but in no way justifies rigging the cards for a Draw. We would have still gotten a rematch if Wilder had taken the deserved L.

 

This is so true Kirk. Had the ref been Richard Steele, Wilder would still be the heavyweight champion of the world!

 

This.

And even more importantly, Fury won the remainder of the round after he got up.

Wilder got a gift with that draw.

 

No the count starts when Fury hits the mat.

 

I love to see the Wilderettes still stuck on this BS.

You want an example of a fighter getting a long break to save them from getting KTFO?

See Wilder / Ortiz 1 where Wilder was ready to get tucked into bed by Grandpa.