Parker's resume (simplified)

Parker and Whyte are aged.

 

''Lost several rounds'' against Cojanu.

 

Parker is <30, Whyte is 32 y.o elephant declared as up coming future world champion.
While unlces with not proper surnames are considered: they were in their best shape when they were 37-38-39-40-41 y.o.
Yeah.

 

Welcome back LDBC.

Because we all know there is an angle here, I’ll nip it in the bud. All of the above may be the case, but he would still beat everyone but Fury on Wilders resume.

 

Im no Parker fan but the OP is full of exaggeration

 

My opinion on Parkers resume:

Chisora - I thought Parker deservedly the right winner.

Takam - I scored it 8- 4 Parker. I thought the rounds were clear cut to judge.

Ruiz - I had Parker winning 7-5 again clear cut rounds to judge in a decent fight.

Hughie - Worst fight I've ever seen. Horrible and difficult fight to score but I gave to Parker (that's after watching it a second time - don't why i tortured myself like that).

FA - Another ugly fight which was hard to score but Fa just didn't do enough for me and was too negative which why I had Parker winning.

AJ - AJ won comfortably on points fighting on the backfoot in much more negative Manor than we have seen from AJ at the time.

Whyte - even ignoring the KD that should not of stood,, I had Whyte winning clearly on points even despite the late scare and Whyte hanging on for dear life in the last round. If rematch was to happen though I reckon Parker would win it.

Overall it's amongst the top 5 resumes at HW after AJ, Whyte, Fury and also considering Povetkin has retired. It's a hell of a lot better resume than Wilder,, that's for sure.

Will Parker be champion again? I can't see beating AJ or Usyk. However against a lesser opponent for vacant belt? Yes that could happen.

 

From where you had get this?
Ortiz had beat or fought vs no one well known name ( outside of US fans scope of view ), expect Wilder who is just a bit known name.
In US he is name.
Might Ortiz beat Whyte or Chisora?
We do not know cos he did not had fought vs them.
Not to talk about other boxers.
Murica rullz.
He isn't Holyfield etc alike boxers.
We do not know who Ortiz is able to beat.

 

Ortiz only notable win is Jennings. Jennings only notable win (ignoring Perez which should have been a draw due to the controversial point deduction) was against Spzilka and Rudenko?

Stiverne whose only notable win is beating Arreola whose only notable win is beating Molina?

Above a guy who has beaten Ruiz, Chisora, Takam and Hughie?

In the words of Fish eyes "Do ME A FAVOUR!".

 

He exposed the limited Wilder, so naturally, Dubblechin needs to find a way to pump up Ortiz.

That's what he does. Each thread has an angle, and that angle is to pump up Wilder.
It's all an attempt to soothe the sleepless nights he's had since pillow fist Fury slapped him around the ring.

 

"Lucked out" by beating a guy for vacant title who went onto to be the first guy to beat the HW with the best resume in the divison?

I know it's not quite the murderers row that Wilder went through to become champion is it? Beating Malik Scott (who had already lost to Chisora) who took a blatant dive against Wilder, then by beating the at the time 25-16-4 Jason Gavern to earn a title shot against the great and almighty Stiverne.

 

It'd be nice if the OP would also mention how old Parker was for each of those fights, and compare that to his beloved Ortiz.