So can we agree letting a fight "marinate" is dumb af?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Glass City Cobra, Sep 26, 2021.

  1. Glass City Cobra

    Glass City Cobra H2H Burger King

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2017
    Messages:
    10,609
    Likes Received:
    18,219
    So many mega fights that should have happened: Lennox vs Bowe, Khan vs brook, wilder vs Joshua, Crawford vs Spence, Spence vs Thurman, etc

    Not to mention fights that did actually happen but it was a letdown because they took too long such as may vs pac, or Tyson vs Holyfield (Douglas and prison derailed).

    Now we recently have the ruined potentially $100 million dollar mega fight between fury and Joshua. Congrats to Usyk, but this threw a wet towel on a division that was on fire. Boxing had just started to make a bit of a comeback and the HWs we're looking great for a while, but so much ducking, arguing over money, and delays ruined it. Covid can't be used as a scape goat because this has been an ongoing problem for several years.

    When are fighters and promoters going to wake up and stop being dumb? They need to stop trying to milk things out and follow the may vs pac blueprint, that was a once in a century jackpot and it left the fans betrayed.

    It's a symptom of an even greater problem which is that so many of the best simply aren't fighting the best. To get paid as a prize fighter, you need to fight. Nobody wants to pay boxers to fight a bunch of Jesus Soto Karasses or Chris Areolas when there are prime ranked fighters in the division.
     
  2. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2010
    Messages:
    93,219
    Likes Received:
    27,933
    marinate usually rather means avoid, duck or postpone for easier paydays and avoid a loss and marketability.
     
  3. It's Ovah

    It's Ovah I am very feel me good. Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2016
    Messages:
    14,882
    Likes Received:
    19,143
    Of course it’s a dumb idea, but ultimately if a better fighter throws a spanner in the works that all works out for us fans surely? We end up with a potentially better and more competitive fight? OK, might not be a mega-event or whatever, but who cares? You’re not seeing a penny of that money.

    With Usyk beating Joshua we now how a more intriguing and evenly-matched potential fight against Fury. That’s all to the good as far as I’m concerned.
     
  4. UniversalPart

    UniversalPart Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2010
    Messages:
    14,634
    Likes Received:
    11,809
    Yup

    Now all we need is Fury to get chinned by Wilder and all the mega fights worth a lick disappear only to be replaced by Wilder returning to his PBC "bum of the month" club, Fury going back to 400lbs and Joshua spending the next few years looking for his confidence.
     
  5. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,718
    Likes Received:
    3,533
    Yes. Fights should only "marinate" during a build up.
     
  6. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    46,702
    Likes Received:
    14,162
    Pac fought Maynever..6 years after Hatton/Cotto

    Simply unacceptable..
     
  7. Ted Stickles

    Ted Stickles Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2007
    Messages:
    6,244
    Likes Received:
    2,185
    Marinate in boxing means wait till the other guy starts to show vulnerability
     
  8. Glass City Cobra

    Glass City Cobra H2H Burger King

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2017
    Messages:
    10,609
    Likes Received:
    18,219
    Yes usyk vs fury is intriguing on paper. But it probably won't be particularly exciting outside of the fact it may be for undisputed if fury gets past wilder again.

    It's not about me seeing a penny. The point is BOTH the fans and fighters suffer if the best don't fight the best. We get lots of boring fights or mismatches and potentially great matchups are delayed or ruined.

    Wilder vs Joshua was exciting because it was two undefeated hard hitters in their prime fighting for all the belts.

    Fury vs Joshua was exciting because it was the first time a true British showdown occured for the HW title in eons. Plus the style clash was interesting.

    It's quite possible neither of these fights happen ever now. If wilder loses again, he'll likely be mentally shot and could disappear. And there's no guarantee Joshua will ever return to form either. Fury is also a head case and who knows what he'll do.
     
    sasto, Eastern Iron and cross_trainer like this.
  9. gollumsluvslave

    gollumsluvslave Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2020
    Messages:
    3,375
    Likes Received:
    5,373
    I don't think Usyk beating AJ has thrown a wet towel on the division - au contraire - I think it's the big shake up the division has needed.
     
    DynamicMoves likes this.
  10. Mickc

    Mickc Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2015
    Messages:
    2,472
    Likes Received:
    2,635
    Exactly this,seems like good business at the time but clearly isn’t .
     
    Eastern Iron likes this.
  11. Jennifer Love Hewitt

    Jennifer Love Hewitt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,850
    Likes Received:
    2,149
    "Marinate" is promoter speak for, "I think there is a good chance my guy will loose, and I want to make more money by having him fight as many bums as possible before I cash him out"
     
  12. Lesion of Doom

    Lesion of Doom Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2015
    Messages:
    4,941
    Likes Received:
    7,610
    Really? I think it's terrible. It further delays unification because of the rematch clause, and the ultimate fight for undisputed looks like a dud matchup. Fury vs Usyk is not the stuff dreams are made of. Joshua/Wilder in 2019 would have been an epic event, and 2021 Joshua/Fury also would have been great. Not there's a delay for something that isn't that great to begin with.

    Imo, there's more money in Joshua/Wilder next summer than Usyk/Fury. It's a better matchup with some residual bad blood. If I were AJ, I'd drop the rematch and free up Usyk and Fury to unify. Then, if he can beat Wilder, get his shot at the title. If he loses again to Usyk, he will have to rebuild.
     
  13. ConfusedGuy

    ConfusedGuy Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2020
    Messages:
    413
    Likes Received:
    742
    Was about to type exaclty this.
     
    covetousjuice likes this.
  14. Glass City Cobra

    Glass City Cobra H2H Burger King

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2017
    Messages:
    10,609
    Likes Received:
    18,219
    I agree, fury vs usyk is not a very exciting matchup. Fury should have gotten the stupid wilder rematch over with, he might have been able to fight Joshua and pay usyk step aside money.

    Buncha freaking drama queen boxers and money grubbing promoters. They always have to make things complicated.
     
    sasto and cross_trainer like this.
  15. Peterp

    Peterp Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,686
    Likes Received:
    336
    Unfortunately it doesn't work out like that. Usyk v Fury does a fraction of the money of Joshua v Fury had Joshua won

    To the casual sports fan, Usyk isn't that marketable.