You say that Canelo undoubtedly lost the rematch. That's a list of some of boxing's current fighters, trainers, atg trainers, and boxing legends who had Canelo beating Golovkin.
IsaL: Here's a list who said Canelo won the rematch. kiwi: No! You're wrong, those people said the first fight was a draw.
But they didn't. The first 5 on that list said the fight was a draw. At what age did your parents drop you on your head? So you both (the same person, but I'll play along), just admitted that you consider a draw for Canelo, a win? Speaks volumes in itself.
https://thegruelingtruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/GGG-Alvarez-Scorecards-1.png https://thegruelingtruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/GGG-Alvarez-Scorecards-2.png https://thegruelingtruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/GGG-Alvarez-Scorecards-3.png https://thegruelingtruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/GGG-Alvarez-Scorecards-4.png
What I am mostly surprised and impressed about is that shaddow , isal , ph33rknot are cool smart dudes , I like them , but their loyalty to clen is ****ing crazy. You mofos need to relax, nobody says canelo isn’t great , I am just saying GGG def beat him at least once and most people agree with me.
If me and @IsaL were the same person, that would mean that IsaL created my account 9+ years ago as an alt for his. But why would he do that all those years ago? That was long before Canelo had ever become the polarizing figure that sits at the top of the sport. You're deflecting after you confused the opinions of legends being about the first fight instead of the rematch. Oops lol. Maybe you should pay a little more attention next time. And who said anything about the draw being a win for Canelo? All the draw did was expose the bold predictions that heavily predicted a resounding GGG win or TKO. But that never happened now did it. And the result of the rematch proved the minority right and the majority wrong. Hey guess what kiwi, I'm in the minority who got it right. Maybe you could learn something from me and others who more accurately predicted what would happen between Canelo and GGG. You were one of the fools who thought GGG was gonna TKO Canelo right? What happened? How come GGG couldn't come close to doing what so many said he would?
I appreciate the support, but the fact of the matter is GGG never beat Canelo. You thinking that GGG won at least one of those is your opinion, no problem with that. But the line is crossed when somebody tries to tell me I can't have a different opinion to theirs, an opinion that just so happens to be consistent with what occurred. I have no loyalty to Canelo or any fighter, I simply call it as I see it with no biases or expectation.
And why is that? Are you not capable of responding in an intelligent manner? You prefer to be a nonsense repeating troll apparently. Hey, whatever floats your boat.
https://thegruelingtruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/GGG-Alvarez-Scorecards-1.png https://thegruelingtruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/GGG-Alvarez-Scorecards-2.png https://thegruelingtruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/GGG-Alvarez-Scorecards-3.png https://thegruelingtruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/GGG-Alvarez-Scorecards-4.png
Give me a break. I'm no man's bodyguard lmao. Bro the people I'm engaged with are dedicated to defending GGG's image. Why would anyone care that I am cool with Canelo winning if they didn't have a massive investment in protecting GGG?
Just face it, Canelo beat GGG and he beat him good. And the vast majority didn't predict that, in fact the majority predicted the opposite and got exposed. That's the ending to this story. That's nothing to get your panties in a bunch over, that's just the reality of what happened. Now I get that a lot of people, hell most of this forum is adament that GGG deserved victory against Canelo. And I'm sensitive to that, that's why you never see me telling anyone who thinks that that they're wrong about that or any boxing match for that matter. Boxing judging is subjective, and the only problem I have is when someone tries to tell me I have to agree with their view of a match or I'm not "knowledgable" or credible. If everyone had their way, everybody's inidividual opinion on everything would be the only way anyone could see something. I recognize that we all have different opinions about what we see in the ring. And for me, it's not about peer pressuring anyone into taking a popular opinion just to fit in. Many times it's the small minority who see thingss the clearest because they're not influenced by the propaganda or the hype as much. It's about how you back your claims, how you explain your scoring and the reasoning behind it.