Tyson Fury hasnt beaten Usyk. Before people crown him (the media, especially American media already has) he should actually beat an elite fighter at or near his prime. I respect Fury's skills. We have never seen them from a man his size before. He is a unique fighter. But if we haven't seen them translate at the top then it's a hypothetical. Media is declaring "Fury at the top of the heap a great HW". Blah, blah, blah. I dont think Deontay Wilder and an old Wlad cut the mustard. If we are talking greatness.
Hey! That's awful. Between this and the insight you provided in the thread you started after you actually watched the fight, you've illuminated the forum these past two days, and I just wanted to say thanks.
Agree with this. I think the last fight proved that Fury has guts, but I have never really rated Wilder that highly. If your career is summed up by "Beat Ortiz, got a gift of a draw vs Fury, crushed a bunch of cans" it does not make you a good measuring stick. I think Joshua is way better than WIlder and I think he'll prove that should they ever fight.
Yup I get that the scrap was entertaining and all that but let him fight Usyk first before crowning him as the de facto ruler of the heavies, recency bias is a helluva drug. Now since he's damaged the delusional Dosser everyone thinks he's got the best pair of hairy jiggly tits in the town.
He is the ruler of the heavies though. Whether you count from when he beat Wladimir for the lineal heavyweight championship or when the numbers 1 and 2 in Wilder and Fury clashed for a new lineage in their second fight, Fury is HW king. Usyk is definitely his number one challenger - but Usyk-Fury won't crown anyone unless Usyk beats him. Fury is number one, while Usyk has been so good in going 3-0 at HW, he is clearly number two.
I think the American media have probably done this as he beat the American champion. It kinda props Wilder up I guess, which you can understand. But yeah the other media outlets around the world have too, so I get what you’re saying. Like, he almost definitely is the best HW, but beating Wilder doesn’t definitively prove it.
Fury was crowned in Dusseldorf in 2015. Yes, beating old Wlad does cut the mustard, because Wlad was regarded as the champion by everyone in boxing at that point (even the managers of new WBC champ Wilder conceded Wlad was the real champ at that point). You beat the champ, you're the champ. Then, Fury went AWOL and gave up his belts. But since he came back 3 years ago he has remained undefeated, defeated Wilder 3 times in reality (twice officially, and by KO), and there's no reason to deny him the crown. He's #1 at the moment. Usyk is #2 and the outstanding challenger to Fury at the moment, and might well go on to take that crown from Fury. But there's no need to deny Fury his #1 position right now.
My point is that beating Wilder for the third time doesn't prove it, he needs to fight someone who can push his **** in someway other than just posing the threat of the big right hand. I feel the #1 spot in HW is up for the grabs between Usyk and Fury, whoever wins should be the man of the division.
This is correct, but only because he had already proven it. He was already lineal, he was already number one, and he will be listed as such by every reputable source in the world once they're updated. There is almost no disputing it. Look, Fury wanted to fight Anthony Joshua and was ordered by a court to fight Deontay Wilder. He did, thrashed him, and is clearly the world's number one heavy - there's no real argument to the contrary. Of course, there is absolutely zero possibility that those two fight and the loser is the number one heavyweight, that goes beyond saying - but if Usyk beats AJ then fights Helenius so he doesn't lose the WBA belt, what is your position? "There is no number one"?
Exactly. If they wanna crown him as the best of this generation, he need to beat Usyk/Joshua or both. I also don't get why some people totally miss the aspect of that he ducked Klitschko rematch twice. In my book that hurt him big time.
Absolutely it's up for grabs. This linear heavyweight championship is a total myth anyway. Fury beat a near the end Wlad, took 3 years off and then drew and beat twice an average heavyweight with a thin resume. In the meantime Usyk became undisputed cruiser champ and now holds 3 of the 4 main belts. How the **** can Fury be the undisputed number one in the division? The american boxing media are biased and usually totally ignorant. Had to laugh when Kenny said Usyk had 2 belts. He knows all to well Usyk has 3 but any reason to down grade Usyk will suffice even fibbing about how many belts he has. **** even the hostess of their ppv pretended she wasn't at Usyks fight the week before. It's laughable. It beggars belief how anybody can view an Usyk masterpiece the week before and then watch Fury on the weekend and declare that Fury is clearly the champ.
His win against Wlad was not even close. He beat Wlad very clearly without even doing anything much. It was horribly dull and one-sided. He harmed his legacy by going AWOL for almost 3 years but there was nothing in the Wlad fight that makes a missed rematch much of an issue.