I believe this is pretty open an shut. They haven't fought yet, we can assume all we want who'd win, but we have to go off records. Losses matter, but I believe who you've beaten should matter more. DON'T just fantasize about who you think may beat who, if we're deciding rank, you gotta look at records and actual victories that have happened. Look at what's proven, not what you believe may happen. Below is a list of Joshua and Wilder's best wins. You decide which is better. Joshua's best wins - Wladmir Povetkin Ruiz Whyte Parker Pulev Takam Wilders best wins - Ortiz Breazeale Arreola Washington Stiverne Artur Szpilka Molina
If you base your ranking on predominantly resume, meaning that fighters proven ability then I can't see how you can have Wilder above Joshua, it's not even close. Only way you can rank Wilder above him is if resume as a criteria is less important than who you think might win the fight. Personally I don't agree with that, but that's just my opinion.
I would rank Wilder higher currently. AJ has lost 2 of his last 4 fights and both of those were against fighters who I didn't have in top 5 (or even top 10, in Ruiz case) going in against AJ. Wilder has lost his last 2 too but to a single top 3 guy who I have at #1.
If you go back tp 2018 and before, yes, we can see AJ has better record. But on recent form, not really. Be fair to Wilder, although I enjoyed seeing him beaten up, he did come close to KOing Fury at one point there. AJ never looked to be ahead against Usyk from what I recall. I base rankings on recent form ie. last few fights. Not what they did 5 years ago.
AJ is about to get knocked out. Wilder has lost, but to the best HW in the world. Really hard call. Fury Usyk Wilder/AJ Whyte
In order to have Wilder ahead of AJ you'd have to rate Fury so highly that you'd be ranking Wilder on the basis that he knocked Fury down a few times across 30 combined rounds, while winning maybe 5 rounds in the entire trilogy, getting stopped twice, and in most peoples eyes losing all three fights. I mean, I know Fury is good but is he THAT good? didnt he get knocked down by Steve Cunningham too? who else in the top 10 has he fought since he came back?
AJ has a KO over 39 year old Pulev and a points win over a fat Ruiz in the last two years. He lost to then-unranked Ruiz before that, by brutal TKO. And he lost cleatly in his mostly recent fight, to Usyk. It really is not unreasonable to rank Wilder higher right now, even though he was battered by Fury in his last 2 fights. It is close but I would have Wilder above right now. Better still, have them joint 3rd and let them fight it out.
Wilder would obviously knock Joshua out. Joshua can't take a punch and was battered by Rice Pudding Jr.
Wilder needs to fight a live body next. Maybe he will go the slow boat to China route again but he doesn't have the time. He should aim for Whyte, Ruiz types as the contenders in the division so he can get back into the running for championship fights. However, if AJ loses rematch, an AJ vs Wilder fight would certainly be entertaining and end plenty of speculation on this forum. AJ is ahead in the rankings because Wilder's bum squad resume just doesn't stack up. Sure Wilder lost to Fury, who is probably top 2 but can be confirmed with a unification fight, but he lost. He fought bravely, but was koed. I don't dislike Wilder, but he needs to fight some live bodies.
AJ has a far superior resume in almost half the amount of fights and he avenged one of his losses which was on away soil, whereas The Tuscaloser is truthfully 0-3 in his own back garden to Fury
Fury has done more to prove himself #1, but Usyk arguably has the best win on his record since AJ is a better win than Wlad and arguably better than Wilder.
Time will show that Usyk is by far the best of this era, and that Joshua's loss to him was nothing to be too ashamed of. Joshua is the number 3 by an absolute landslide... and in my (probably unpopular) opinion, would have beaten that Fury from the other night.